0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Recyclable, but not recycled—an indicator to quantify the environmental impacts of plastic waste disposal

Frontiers in Environmental Science 2024 5 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

This study developed an indicator to quantify the environmental impact of plastic products that are technically recyclable but are not actually recycled in practice, addressing the gap between theoretical recycling potential and real-world recovery rates. The indicator enables more accurate life cycle assessments of plastic product sustainability.

With an exponential increase in the production and consumption of plastic products over the last few years, the predominantly linear (take-make-dispose) economy of the plastic life cycle has captured global attention. Even though plastic products offer versatile benefits with their properties across different sectors, with a global recycling rate of less than 10%, it is challenging to reduce the pollution generated by plastic waste. Also, the loss of resources due to the uncontrolled disposal of plastic waste has been projected to cause long-term negative effects on the environment. To ensure a better circularity of the plastic flows across the world, it is essential to design plastic products that have an adequate infrastructure to recover and recycle the waste no matter where they are used. The polymer manufacturers and the plastics converters must account for the environmental impacts of the resources lost in the environment due to the lack of recycling infrastructure as a part of Extended Producer Responsibility. This study introduces an indicator that accounts for the loss of resources and proposes for a better methodology to quantify the environmental impacts of polymers and plastic products, based on their recyclability and the availability of recycling infrastructure to handle them. By integrating the loss of resources with the environmental impacts of specific polymers used in specific plastic products, the stakeholders across the value chain have the choice to select the polymers and products that are actually recycled, thereby reducing their environmental impacts and increasing the circularity.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Recommendations for life-cycle assessment of recyclable plastics in a circular economy

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper examines how life-cycle assessments of plastic recycling are often conducted inconsistently, leading to misleading conclusions about the environmental benefits of recycling. The authors recommend measuring impacts based on the amount of useful recycled product rather than waste processed, and expanding analysis beyond greenhouse gases to include plastic waste leaking into the environment. Better assessment methods could lead to more effective policies for reducing the plastic waste that ultimately becomes microplastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

How accurate is plastic end-of-life modeling in LCA? Investigating the main assumptions and deviations for the end-of-life management of plastic packaging

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers reviewed 49 life cycle assessment (LCA) studies on plastic packaging disposal and found that most models oversimplify real-world recycling processes and ignore key factors like plastic additives and microplastic generation. These gaps mean current environmental impact estimates for plastic disposal may significantly understate the true ecological costs.

Article Tier 2

Methodology to address potential impacts of plastic emissions in life cycle assessment

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers proposed a new method for including the environmental impact of plastic emissions in life cycle assessments, which currently tend to make plastic products appear less harmful than alternatives. The approach introduces characterization factors based on how long different plastics persist in the environment. The study suggests that accounting for plastic pollution in these assessments could significantly change how the environmental footprint of plastic products is evaluated.

Systematic Review Tier 1

Life cycle assessment of plastic waste end-of-life management: a systematic review

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers systematically reviewed 2019–2025 life cycle assessment literature on plastic waste end-of-life management, finding that global warming potential dominates as the studied impact category and that recycling, incineration, pyrolysis, and landfilling each carry distinct environmental trade-offs, with significant gaps remaining in geographic coverage and functional unit standardization.

Review

Plastic recycling: A panacea or environmental pollution problem

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examined the effectiveness of plastic recycling as a solution to plastic pollution, finding that global recycling rates of only 9% are insufficient given annual production exceeding 400 million metric tonnes. The authors identified key gaps in recycling efficiency for thermoset plastics and proposed advanced recycling methods, design-for-recyclability principles, and the Global Plastics Treaty as emerging solutions.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper