We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Impact of Cleaning on Membrane Performance during Surface Water Treatment: A Hybrid Process with Biological Ion Exchange and Gravity-Driven Membranes
Summary
This paper is not about microplastics — it studies how physical and chemical cleaning methods affect the flux and permeate quality of ceramic and polymeric membranes used in a hybrid biological ion exchange and gravity-driven membrane system for treating river water.
In this study, the hybrid biological ion exchange (BIEX) resin and gravity-driven membrane (GDM) process was employed for the treatment of coloured and turbid river water. The primary objective was to investigate the impact of both physical and chemical cleaning methods on ceramic and polymeric membranes in terms of their stabilised flux, flux recovery after physical/chemical cleaning, and permeate quality. To address these objectives, two types of MF and UF membranes were utilised (M1 = polymeric MF, M2 = polymeric UF, M3 = ceramic UF, and M4 = lab-made ceramic MF). Throughout the extended operation, the resin functioned initially in the primary ion exchange (IEX) region (NOM displacement with pre-charged chloride) and progressed to a secondary IEX stage (NOM displacement with bicarbonate and sulphate), while membrane flux remained stable. Subsequently, physical cleaning involved air/water backwash with two different flows and pressures, and chemical cleaning utilised NaOH at concentrations of 20 and 40 mM, as well as NaOCl at concentrations of 250 and 500 mg Cl2/L. These processes were carried out to assess flux recovery and identify fouling reversibility. The results indicate an endpoint of 1728 bed volumes (BVs) for the primary IEX region, while the secondary IEX continued up to 6528 BV. At the end of the operation, DOC and UVA254 removal in the effluent of the BIEX columns were 68% and 81%, respectively, compared to influent water. This was followed by 30% and 57% DOC and UVA254 removal using M4 (ceramic MF). The stabilised flux remained approximately 3.8-5.2 LMH both before and after the cleaning process, suggesting that membrane materials do not play a pivotal role. The mean stabilised flux of polymeric membranes increased after cleaning, whereas that of the ceramics decreased. Enhanced air-water backwash flow and pressure resulted in an increased removal of hydraulic reversible fouling, which was identified as the dominant fouling type. Ceramic membranes exhibited a higher removal of reversible hydraulic fouling than polymeric membranes. Chemical cleaning had a low impact on flux recovery; therefore, we recommend solely employing physical cleaning.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Analysis of membrane surface after the filtration of surface water containing microplastic
Researchers tested ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes on real river water containing microplastics and found both membrane types completely removed plastic particles from the filtered water, though the deposited microplastics reduced water flow through the membranes over time — confirming membrane filtration as an effective but imperfect water treatment strategy.
Mitigation of membrane particulate fouling by nano/microplastics via physical cleaning strategies
This study assessed physical cleaning strategies for removing nano- and microplastic fouling from membrane surfaces used in water treatment, finding that backwashing and chemical cleaning effectiveness varied by plastic particle size and surface charge.
Membrane Cleaning Technologies for Water Treatment: A Review
Membrane filtration is one of the most effective technologies for removing microplastics from drinking water and wastewater, but membranes clog over time and require regular cleaning to maintain performance. This review evaluates the full range of cleaning methods—from simple water backwashing to ultrasonic treatment, advanced oxidation processes, and electrochemical approaches—comparing their effectiveness at removing different types of fouling without damaging the membrane. Understanding optimal cleaning strategies is important for designing cost-effective, long-lasting filtration systems that can reliably remove microplastics at scale.
Effects of Permeate Flux in Adsorption/Coagulation-Membrane Filtration System for Removing Turbid Matter and Humic Acid from River Water
Researchers investigated the effects of varying permeate flux in an adsorption/coagulation-membrane filtration system designed to remove turbid matter, humic acid, and microplastics from river water intended for drinking. They found that permeate flux significantly influenced membrane fouling rates and removal efficiency of natural organic matter and colloidal particles, informing operational optimization of this combined treatment approach.
Microplastics affect membrane biofouling and microbial communities during gravity-driven membrane filtration of primary wastewater
Researchers investigated how microplastics of different sizes and concentrations affect gravity-driven membrane filtration systems used for decentralized wastewater treatment. The study found that microplastics reduced permeate flux by 9 to 54% and altered biofilm microbial communities on the membrane surface, potentially compromising treatment performance.