We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Larger Common River Frogs (Amietia delalandii) have Fewer and Shorter Tissue Microplastic Fibres than Smaller Frogs
Summary
Researchers investigated microplastic contamination in adult Common River Frogs from South Africa, analyzing water, skin, intestine, and body tissue samples. The study found that microplastic fibers were present in all frogs examined, with larger frogs containing fewer and shorter fibers than smaller ones, suggesting possible size-related differences in microplastic accumulation or clearance.
Little is known about microplastics (MPs) in adult frogs. We investigated MPs in adult Common River Frogs (Amietia delalandii) from Potchefstroom, South Africa. Five kinds of samples were analysed: natural water, water used to rinse the skin, skin, intestine, and the remainder of the body (corpus). Tissues were digested. Microplastics occurred in all frogs and sample types (1128 MPs counted). Fibres were the most prevalent MP. Fibre lengths were between 28 and 4300 μm, either polyester or polyvinyl alcohol. MPs in skin were likely derived from the ambient, and MPs in the corpus from translocation via the skin. Fibres in tissues were significantly shorter in larger frogs, a phenomenon we provisionally assign to in situ biodegradation. Microplastics in frogs can potentially be transferred through the food web to higher trophic levels. This study provides the first evidence of MPs in adult frog tissues and avenues for further investigations.
Sign in to start a discussion.