0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Food & Water Gut & Microbiome Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Microplastic–microbiome Interactions in Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

AI summary Read the abstract

This survey-based study assessed public awareness of microplastic–microbiome interactions in marine and freshwater ecosystems among 300 respondents in Pakistan. Statistical analysis confirmed that awareness was low across demographic groups and that educational background and media exposure were the strongest predictors of understanding these ecological interactions.

Models
Study Type Environmental

Background: Microplastic contamination is becoming a major worldwide environmental hazard, which influences the aquatic biodiversity, as well as the community dynamics of microorganisms in marine and freshwater environments. The microscopic plastic particles are artificial sources of microbial colonization that create separate communities in the form of a plastisphere, which affect nutrient cycling, pathogen dispersal, and ecosystem wellbeing. Although the interest has increased, there is still a lack of knowledge and awareness among the population as to the interaction between microplastics and the microbiome. This research was conducted to assess the degree of awareness, perception, and understanding of these interactions in the various demographic groups and to statistically confirm the relationships between the critical perception variables. Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative design was adopted by use of a structured Likert scale questionnaire with 16 questions that were distributed under the four different domains: awareness, ecological impact, health and food chain concerns, and mitigation perception. Three hundred answers were obtained from respondents representing different parts of Pakistan. The analyses involved Normality analysis (Shapiro-Wilk), Reliability (Cronbach's Alpha), Validity (KMO and Bartlett test), Independent Samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square analysis, Pearson correlation, and Multiple regression analysis. All the analyses were conducted in SPSS and Python-based statistical modeling. Results: The findings established that all the variables were normally distributed (p > 0.05) and consistent internally with a total Cronbach's Alpha of 0.911, which is excellent. Construct validity was determined by the value of KMO (0.846) and the significance of the Bartlett Test (x 2 = 2643.217, p < 0.001). The difference between the groups was statistically significant in terms of gender (t = 2.684, p = 0.008), education (F = 4.327, p = 0.014), region (H = 10.562, p = 0.032), and gender x education correlation (H 2 = 18.246, p = 0.021). The correlation table showed high positive relationships between all the variables of perception (r = 0.64-0.81). Regression analysis also showed that the overall perception was significantly and positively (β = 0.1380.312) contributed by all predictors and accounted for 68.2 percent variance (R 2 = 0.682). Conclusion: The results reveal an elevated degree of awareness and a positive, strong correlation between ecological knowledge and health-related issues and mitigation plans on the interaction of microplastics and microbiomes. These perceptions are greatly influenced by education, gender, and regional background, motivating the need to adopt specific environmental education and awareness programmes. The paper summarizes that sustainable strategies of water management and pollution control would be impossible without improving the general literacy of the population regarding the mechanisms of interaction between microplastics and microbiomes. The questionnaire constructed in the course of the study and validated and reliable, can be applied as a useful instrument in future ecological perception studies and policy-making.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Internet User Awareness Assessment on the Impact of Microplastics on Health

AI summary Read the abstract

A survey of 281 internet users aged 15–50 across diverse demographics assessed public awareness of microplastic health risks. Results revealed significant gaps in understanding — most respondents had heard of microplastics but underestimated their prevalence in food and water and were unaware of specific health effects. The study highlights that public health messaging about microplastics lags well behind the scientific evidence, which matters because consumer behaviour and policy support both depend on informed public understanding.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in Water and Food: [Not]Awareness

AI summary Read the abstract

A survey of internet users assessing awareness of microplastic contamination in food and water found that most respondents were aware of microplastics in urban water sources but had limited knowledge of specific exposure levels and health risks.

Article Tier 2

Public Awareness, Knowledge, Attitude and Perception on Microplastics Pollution Around Lagos Lagoon

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers surveyed public awareness, knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions regarding microplastic pollution around Lagos Lagoon in Nigeria, finding significant gaps in understanding among residents, students, and fishermen about microplastic health and ecological risks.

Article Tier 2

From Ocean to Table: How Public Awareness Shapes the Fight Against Microplastic Pollution

AI summary Read the abstract

This literature review synthesized global studies on public awareness of microplastic pollution, finding that while scientific knowledge has expanded significantly, public understanding and behavioral change remain limited. The study identified effective communication strategies and policy approaches to bridge the gap between scientific evidence and public action.

Article Tier 2

Making sense of microplastics? Public understandings of plastic pollution

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers conducted focus groups to explore public understanding of microplastics and plastic pollution. Most participants were unaware of microplastics, and few connected their personal plastic use to ocean pollution, instead associating the issue with distant images like the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. The study suggests that the invisible scale of microplastics, limited scientific understanding, and deeply embedded cultural habits around plastic use present significant barriers to behavior change.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper