We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Reply on RC1
Summary
This reply addresses a reviewer comment on a study examining the impacts of Chinese government air pollution control measures on atmospheric pollutant concentrations across multiple regions. The response clarifies aspects of the methodology and interpretation of how emission reductions have affected air quality over recent decades.
Abstract. A series of emission control measures implemented by the Chinese government have effectively reduced air pollution of multiple pollutants in many regions of the country in recent decades. However, the impacts of these control measures on environmental persistent free radicals (EPFRs) and reactive oxygen species (ROS), the two groups of chemical species that are known to be linked with adverse human health effects, are still not clear. In this study, we investigated the levels, patterns, and sources of EPFRs and gas- and particle-phase ROS (referred to as G-ROS and P-ROS, respectively) in Beijing during the 2015 China Victory Day Parade period when short-term air quality control measures were imposed. The strict control measures reduced ambient EPFRs, G-ROS, and P-ROS by 18.3 %, 24.1 %, and 46.9 %, respectively. EPFRs in the non-control period (NCP) tended to be radicals centered on a mixture of carbon and oxygen, while those in the control period (CP) were mainly oxygen-centered free radicals. The contribution of G-ROS to the atmospheric oxidizing capacity increased and/or that of P-ROS decreased during CP compared to NCP. The “Parade Blue” days were largely attributed to the dramatic reduction in secondary aerosols, which were also largely responsible for EPFRs and ROS reductions. Our findings demonstrate how effective control measures are in reducing EPFRs and ROS and provide insights into the correlations, sources, and formation processes of EPFRs and ROS.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Reply on RC1
This is a response to reviewer comments on a study characterizing atmospheric microplastic source profiles and plasticizer emissions from five common pollution sources in PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols across China's Guanzhong Plain.
Reply on RC2
This is a response to reviewer comments on a study characterizing atmospheric microplastic source profiles and plasticizer emissions from five common pollution sources in PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols across China's Guanzhong Plain.
How Does Public Participation in EnvironmentalProtection Affect Air Pollution in China?A Perspective of Local Government Intervention
Researchers used spatial econometric modeling of Chinese panel data from 2003-2017 to find that local government intervention worsens air quality due to inter-regional competition, and that public environmental participation only effectively reduces sulfur dioxide when supported by central government intervention.
Reply on RC3
This is a response to reviewer comments on a study characterizing atmospheric microplastic source profiles and plasticizer emissions from five common pollution sources in PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols across China's Guanzhong Plain.
Reply on RC4
This is a response to reviewer comments on a study characterizing atmospheric microplastic source profiles and plasticizer emissions from five common pollution sources in PM2.5 and PM10 aerosols across China's Guanzhong Plain.