0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Evaluating the structural performance of waste PET-infused interlocking units versus traditional stone masonry

Engineering and Technology Journal 2024 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Omogbolade Adepitan, Omogbolade Adepitan, Ayotunde O. Fasina

Summary

This study is not directly about microplastics — it evaluates the compressive strength and water absorption of interlocking bricks made from waste PET plastic as a partial cement replacement in construction.

Polymers

This study focuses on PET waste reduction worldwide by looking at the application of these polymeric materials in the construction and building industries. An effective application of PET wastes will reduce PET pollution, especially in water bodies. Due to its rising cost, it can partially replace the conventional binder used (cement).Bricks were made in the conventional cement-sand and PET-sand, and a total of 72 cubes were produced for different mix ratios of 1:1, 1.5:1, and 2:1. Their properties like particle size analysis, water absorption, slump testing, and compressive strength were investigated and compared.The particle size analysis showed that the sand was well-graded with a Cu of 3.41 and a Cc of 1.07. The results of the water absorption test showed that, in both series and different mix ratios, the PET-sand interlocking blocks had a lower sorptivity (percentages of 2.02, 2.72, and 4.20) than the cement-sand interlocking blocks (percentages of 0.91, 2.40, and 3.31). The mixtures produced a 70 mm, 50 mm, and 80 mm slump for 1:1, 1.5:1, and 2:1, respectively.The maximum compressive strengths in cement-sand interlocking blocks were 13.89 N/mm2, 17.34 N/mm2, and 21.06 N/mm2 in the 1:1, 1.5:1, and 2:1 respectively. Although the results showed that the compressive strength of PET-sand interlocking bricks was lower than that of cement-sand interlocking bricks, it can be useful in a low-density carriage road.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper