0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Nanoplastics and chrysene pollution: Potential new triggers for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatitis, insights from juvenile Siniperca chuatsi

The Science of The Total Environment 2024 8 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Tiantian Chen, He‐wei Jiang, Yaoji He, Yawei Shen, Zequn Huang, Yifeng Gu, Qun Wei, Jinliang Zhao, Xiaowu Chen

Summary

Researchers exposed juvenile mandarin fish to nanoplastics and the pollutant chrysene, both individually and in combination, and examined the effects on liver health. They found that the combined exposure caused more severe liver damage than either contaminant alone, triggering fat accumulation and inflammatory responses in liver tissue. The study suggests that the interaction between nanoplastics and other environmental pollutants may amplify harmful effects on fish liver function.

Nanopolystyrene (NP) and chrysene (CHR) are ubiquitous contaminants in the natural environment; however, research on their hepatotoxicity and associated adverse effects remains relatively inadequate. The present study aimed to investigate the hepatotoxic effects of NP and/or CHR at environmentally relevant concentrations, as well as the underlying molecular mechanisms, in juvenile Siniperca chuatsi (mandarin fish). After a 21-day exposure period, the livers of exposed S. chuatsi exhibited macrostructural and microstructural damage accompanied by oxidative stress. Importantly, our study provides the first evidence that NP exposure leads to the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and hepatitis in S. chuatsi. Similarly, CHR exposure has also been found, for the first time, to cause hepatic sinusoidal dilatation (HSD) and hepatitis. Exposure to the combination of NP and CHR alleviated the symptoms of NAFLD, HSD, and hepatitis. Furthermore, our comprehensive multi-omic analysis revealed that the pathogenesis of NP-induced NAFLD was mainly due to induction of the triglyceride synthesis pathway and inhibition of the very-low-density lipoprotein secretion process. CHR induced HSD primarily through a reduction in vasoprotective ability and smooth muscle contractility. Hepatitis was induced by activation of the JAK-STAT/NF-kappa B signaling pathways, which upregulated the expression of inflammation-specific genes. Collectively, results of this study offer novel insight into the multiple hepatotoxicity endpoints of NP and/or CHR exposure at environmentally relevant concentrations in organisms, and highlight the importance of nanoplastic/CHR pollution for liver health.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Interactive effects of polystyrene nanoplastics and 6:2 chlorinated polyfluorinated ether sulfonates on the histomorphology, oxidative stress and gut microbiota in Hainan Medaka (Oryzias curvinotus)

Researchers exposed a freshwater fish species to nanoplastics and a fluorinated chemical pollutant, both alone and in combination, and found that the mixture caused more severe tissue damage than either substance alone. The combined exposure harmed gills, liver, and intestines while disrupting antioxidant systems and gut bacteria. The study suggests nanoplastics can worsen the effects of industrial chemicals on aquatic life.

Article Tier 2

Exacerbated interfacial impacts of nanoplastics and 6:2 chlorinated polyfluorinated ether sulfonate by natural organic matter in adult zebrafish: Evidence through histopathology, gut microbiota, and transcriptomic analysis

In a zebrafish study, nanoplastics combined with a fluorinated chemical pollutant and natural organic matter caused more severe liver and intestinal damage than any single pollutant alone. The mixture triggered greater oxidative stress, gut inflammation, and harmful changes to gut bacteria. This research shows that in the real world, where nanoplastics mix with other pollutants, the combined health effects may be worse than studies of individual chemicals suggest.

Article Tier 2

Toxic effects of nanoplastics and microcystin-LR coexposure on the liver-gut axis of Hypophthalmichthys molitrix

Scientists exposed silver carp to both polystyrene nanoplastics and microcystin-LR (a toxin from harmful algae) and found the combination caused more severe gut and liver damage than either pollutant alone. The nanoplastics shortened intestinal structures, changed gut bacteria communities, and disrupted liver metabolism. This is concerning because both contaminants are commonly found together in aquaculture waters, and the fish affected are widely consumed by people.

Article Tier 2

Effects of chronic co-exposure polystyrene nanoplastics and cadmium on liver function in Prussian carp (Carassius gibelio)

Researchers exposed Prussian carp to polystyrene nanoplastics and cadmium, both individually and together, for 21 days and found that the combination caused significantly worse liver damage than either pollutant alone. The nanoplastics enhanced cadmium accumulation in the liver and amplified oxidative stress, tissue damage, and immune gene activation. The findings demonstrate that nanoplastics and heavy metals can have synergistic toxic effects on aquatic organisms.

Article Tier 2

Co-exposure to polystyrene nanoplastics and mercury synergistically exacerbates toxicity in rare minnow (Gobiocypris rarus) compared to individual exposures

This study found that when nanoplastics and mercury are present together in water, their combined toxic effects on fish are significantly worse than either pollutant alone. Researchers observed that nanoplastics increased mercury accumulation in rare minnow tissue by about 33%, and the combination caused greater gut damage, inflammation, and disruption of beneficial gut bacteria. The findings highlight the importance of considering how multiple pollutants interact, rather than studying them in isolation.

Share this paper