We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Linking ecosystem service valuation to environmental policy support: a case study of pollution in the Tennessee River
Summary
Researchers surveyed 422 residents in East Tennessee to examine how ecosystem service preferences relate to support for environmental policies addressing plastic and microplastic pollution in the Tennessee River. They found that preferences for regulating ecosystem services were significant predictors of policy support across all four policy types tested. The study suggests that understanding how communities value environmental regulation functions can help inform more effective pollution control policies.
Social valuation engages local communities and stakeholders to elicit their preferences for ecosystem services, with the expectation that this knowledge can inform environmental policy and decision making. However, it remains unclear whether and how such preferences can be applied to understanding environmental policy problems and predicting support for different types of policy intervention. To address this gap, we examine whether ecosystem service preferences explain variation in support for environmental policy when examined alongside established predictors from the policy sciences, including human values, risk perceptions, and sociodemographic characteristics. We conducted a survey of 422 residents in East Tennessee, USA, where the Tennessee River faces severe plastic and microplastic pollution. Respondents completed measures of ecosystem service preferences, value orientations, and pollution risk perceptions, and then evaluated their support for four policy typologies (distributive, regulatory, redistributive, and constituent) derived from Lowi’s framework. Across all four policy typologies, preferences for regulating ecosystem services were statistically significant predictors of policy support. Mediation results indicated that self-transcendence values were linked to policy support primarily through their association with regulating service preferences rather than through a direct effect. These findings suggest that prioritizing regulating services functions, at least in part, as an applied ecological expression of self-transcendent orientations, translating broad motivational goals into specific ecological priorities. Together, these findings outline a pathway for integrating social valuation into environmental governance and communication strategies, with practical implications for managing plastic pollution in the Tennessee River and other threatened river systems.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Plastic Pollution of the Tennessee River: Comparing Risk Perceptions and Preferred Policy Solutions Between Stakeholders and the Public
Researchers surveyed both the general public and local stakeholders along the Tennessee River about their perceptions of plastic pollution risks and preferred policy solutions. They found that while both groups recognized the environmental and health risks of plastic and microplastic pollution, their preferred approaches to addressing the problem differed. The study highlights the importance of understanding community perspectives when designing effective policies to reduce freshwater plastic contamination.
Public perception of an important urban estuary: Values, attitudes, and policy support in the Biscayne Bay-Miami Social Ecological System
This is not a microplastics study; it surveys public attitudes toward Biscayne Bay in Miami, finding widespread concern about environmental threats to the estuary and strong public support for protective policies — a useful model for how coastal communities can be engaged in environmental governance.
Fishermen’s Preferences for Ecological Policies and Behavior Analysis: A Case Study of Weihai City, China
This paper is not relevant to microplastics research; it analyzes Chinese fishermen's policy preferences for fishery ecological protection using choice experiments and economic modeling, with no focus on plastic pollution.
Environmental Value Assessment of Plastic Pollution Control: A Study Based on Evidence from a Survey in China
Researchers assessed the environmental value of plastic pollution control in China using a choice experiment method with 450 surveyed residents, finding that residents were most willing to pay for source reduction over recycling or cleanup, and that incorporating discount rates and future price changes improves the accuracy of environmental valuation.
Consumer-based actions to reduce plastic pollution in rivers: A multi-criteria decision analysis approach
Researchers applied multi-criteria decision analysis to evaluate consumer-based actions for reducing macroplastic pollution in European freshwater environments, focusing on commonly found single-use plastic items. The analysis ranked actions by their potential to reduce plastic inputs to rivers, providing a framework to guide consumer choices and inform policy targeting the most impactful plastics.