0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Sea surface microplastics in the Galapagos: Grab samples reveal high concentrations of particles <200 μm in size

The Science of The Total Environment 2024 18 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Adam Porter, Katie Deakin, Katie Deakin, Jen Jones, Jen Jones, Jen Jones, David Santillo, Georgie Savage, Juan Pablo Muñoz‐Pérez, Juan Pablo Muñoz‐Pérez, Juan Pablo Muñoz‐Pérez, Katie Deakin, Katie Deakin, Ceri Lewis Adam Porter, Adam Porter, Adam Porter, Adam Porter, Jen Jones, Adam Porter, Jen Jones, Jen Jones, Ceri Lewis Adam Porter, Adam Porter, Jen Jones, Adam Porter, Adam Porter, Adam Porter, Adam Porter, Ceri Lewis Adam Porter, Ceri Lewis Ceri Lewis Adam Porter, Ceri Lewis Ceri Lewis Georgie Savage, Jen Jones, Jen Jones, Ceri Lewis Katie Deakin, Katie Deakin, Katie Deakin, Katie Deakin, Jen Jones, Jen Jones, Jen Jones, Jen Jones, Ceri Lewis Jen Jones, Jen Jones, David Santillo, David Santillo, Adam Porter, David Santillo, Katie Deakin, Adam Porter, Juan Pablo Muñoz‐Pérez, Juan Pablo Muñoz‐Pérez, Adam Porter, Adam Porter, Juan Pablo Muñoz‐Pérez, Ceri Lewis Juan Pablo Muñoz‐Pérez, Juan Pablo Muñoz‐Pérez, Ceri Lewis Katie Deakin, Ceri Lewis Katie Deakin, Ceri Lewis Katie Deakin, Adam Porter, Ceri Lewis Adam Porter, Ceri Lewis Ceri Lewis Ceri Lewis Ceri Lewis Ceri Lewis Ceri Lewis Georgie Savage, Georgie Savage, David Santillo, David Santillo, David Santillo, David Santillo, Ceri Lewis Ceri Lewis Ceri Lewis Ceri Lewis Georgie Savage, Ceri Lewis Ceri Lewis Jen Jones, Jen Jones, David Santillo, David Santillo, Ceri Lewis Ceri Lewis Ceri Lewis Jen Jones, Juan Pablo Muñoz‐Pérez, Jen Jones, Jen Jones, Jen Jones, Ceri Lewis Juan Pablo Muñoz‐Pérez, Ceri Lewis Georgie Savage, David Santillo, David Santillo, David Santillo, David Santillo, David Santillo, Ceri Lewis David Santillo, Jen Jones, Jen Jones, Juan Pablo Muñoz‐Pérez, Jen Jones, Jen Jones, Jen Jones, Jen Jones, Ceri Lewis Jen Jones, Jen Jones, Jen Jones, Jen Jones, Ceri Lewis Ceri Lewis Ceri Lewis Ceri Lewis Ceri Lewis Ceri Lewis Ceri Lewis Ceri Lewis Juan Pablo Muñoz‐Pérez, Adam Porter, Georgie Savage, Adam Porter, David Santillo, Georgie Savage, Georgie Savage, Juan Pablo Muñoz‐Pérez, Georgie Savage, Ceri Lewis Jen Jones, Jen Jones, Ceri Lewis Ceri Lewis Adam Porter, Ceri Lewis

Summary

Researchers compared two microplastic sampling methods in the coastal waters of the Galapagos Islands and found dramatically different results depending on the technique used. Whole seawater grab samples filtered to 1.2 micrometers revealed microplastic concentrations four orders of magnitude higher than traditional plankton net tows with 200-micrometer mesh. The study suggests that standard ocean sampling methods may vastly underestimate the true abundance of small microplastics in marine environments.

Study Type Environmental

Plastic pollution in the oceans is increasing, yet most global sea surface data is collected using plankton nets which limits our knowledge of the smaller and more bioaccessible size fraction of microplastics (<5 mm). We sampled the biodiverse coastal waters of the Galapagos Island of San Cristobal, comparing two different microplastic sampling methodologies; 1 l whole seawater grab samples filtered to 1.2 μm and sea surface plankton tows with a net mesh size of 200 μm. Our data reveal high concentrations of microplastics in Galapagos coastal waters surrounding the urban area, averaging 11.5 ± 1.48 particles l<sup>-1</sup>, with a four-order of magnitude increase in microplastic abundance observed using grab sampling compared with 200 μm plankton nets. This increase was greater when including anthropogenic cellulose particles, averaging 19.8 ± 1.86 particles l<sup>-1</sup>. Microplastic and anthropogenic cellulose particles smaller than 200 μm comprised 44 % of the particles from grab samples, suggesting previous estimates of microplastic pollution based on plankton nets likely miss and therefore underestimate these smaller particles. The particle characteristics and distribution of these smaller particles points strongly to a local input of cellulosic fibres in addition to the microplastic particles transported longer distances via the Humbolt current found across the surface seawater of the Galapagos. Improving our understanding of particle characteristics and distributions to highlight likely local sources will facilitate the development of local mitigation and management plans to reduce the input and impacts of microplastics to marine species, not just in the Galapagos but globally.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper