We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
The global governance of marine plastic pollution: rethinking the extended producer responsibility system
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper analyzes the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system as a governance tool for tackling marine plastic pollution, comparing its implementation across the EU, US, and China. EPR requires plastic producers to take responsibility for the full lifecycle of their products, including waste management. The study identifies challenges in applying EPR internationally but argues it is essential for reducing the plastic waste that breaks down into the microplastics contaminating oceans and seafood.
The harm caused by marine plastic pollution to the wider environment highlights its importance as a governance issue. The Fifth United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA) adopted a resolution, “End Plastic Pollution: Towards an International Legally Binding Instrument”, which represents a shift towards globalism in the governance of marine plastic pollution. This resolution focuses on the circular economy of plastics and highlights the role of corporations in contributing to a more socially responsible society, thereby increasing emphasis has been placed on the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system that integrates the two factors referred to above. This paper provides a full technical explanation of the EPR system and its implementation in entities such as the European Union, the United States, and China. The challenges faced when integrating the EPR system into international legal instruments for plastic governance were identified, including the different national perspectives, the absence of a supervisor in the public domain, the obscurity of its application, and the lack of supporting measures for the implementation of the system. Therefore, new standards and requirements in the governance of marine plastic pollution and the advantages associated with implementing the full-life-cycle obligations under the EPR system on plastic producers should be fully considered. On this basis, the positioning and implications of the EPR system should be clarified by obligation-oriented regulation and extension-based interpretation. Moreover, the extended and prolonged applicability of the system, including the original sources of marine plastic wastes and considerations of the full-life-cycle of plastics, should be achieved in pursuit of improvements and upgrades in application and complementary policies. If this can be achieved, it is hoped that the goals of protecting human health and controlling plastic pollution can be achieved, contributing to the development of an ocean-based economy and a better world.
More Papers Like This
An overview of the problems posed by plastic products and the role of extended producer responsibility in Europe
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper outlines the environmental and human health harms of plastic waste in Europe and evaluates Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) as a policy tool to reduce plastic pollution. The authors argue that EPR can strengthen waste collection and recycling infrastructure when applied within the European waste management hierarchy.
Accelerating Extended Producer Responsibility implementation in Indonesia to combat plastic pollution
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper examines plastic pollution challenges in Indonesia and proposes extended producer responsibility (EPR) as a key mitigation strategy, drawing lessons from four countries with successful EPR systems. Seven targeted recommendations are offered, including creating a unified EPR coordination agency and implementing public awareness programs to reduce plastic pollution in Indonesia.
Governance Solutions to the Tragedy of the Commons That Marine Plastics Have Become
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper examines marine plastic pollution as a "tragedy of the commons" and evaluates existing and proposed governance frameworks for addressing this shared environmental challenge. It argues that effective solutions will require international coordination, extended producer responsibility, and complementary regulatory and market-based instruments.
Marine plastic pollution and extended producer responsibility in the G20
AI summary Read the abstract
This systematic mapping of 100 academic and policy sources analyzed how extended producer responsibility (EPR) can reduce marine plastic litter in G20 countries, which are responsible for a significant portion of global plastic production and consumption. The review recommended strengthening legislative frameworks, incentivizing plastic return markets, improving lifecycle management of plastics, and coordinating EPR strategies from global conventions to local implementation in the context of ongoing UNEA Resolution 5/14 treaty negotiations.
Global Plastic Pollution and the Transition Towards a Circular Economy: Lessons from the EU’s Legal Framework on Plastics
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper reviews the EU legal framework on plastics and the transition toward a circular economy, examining how regulatory instruments including the Single-Use Plastics Directive and extended producer responsibility schemes can reduce the billions of tons of plastic waste generated annually.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.