0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Do’s and don’ts of microplastic research: a comprehensive guide

Water Emerging Contaminants & Nanoplastics 2024 41 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 70 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Muhammad Tariq Khan, Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Muhammad Tariq Khan, Tony R. ‎Walker Muhammad Tariq Khan, Muhammad Tariq Khan, Muhammad Tariq Khan, Tony R. ‎Walker Muhammad Tariq Khan, Muhammad Tariq Khan, Jorge Padrão, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Tony R. ‎Walker Muhammad Tariq Khan, Tony R. ‎Walker Muhammad Tariq Khan, Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Muhammad Tariq Khan, Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Joana C. Prata, Jorge Padrão, Muhammad Tariq Khan, Joana C. Prata, Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Muhammad Tariq Khan, Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Muhammad Tariq Khan, Tony R. ‎Walker Muhammad Tariq Khan, Tony R. ‎Walker Muhammad Tariq Khan, Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Joana C. Prata, Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Muhammad Tariq Khan, Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker Tony R. ‎Walker

Summary

This guide, created by surveying researchers in the field, addresses the biggest challenges in microplastic science, including the lack of standardized methods, limited access to analytical equipment, and difficulty replicating real-world exposure levels in lab tests. It provides best practices for defining, sampling, and testing the health effects of microplastics, aiming to make research more consistent and reliable across studies.

Microplastics are environmental contaminants consisting of small plastics ≤ 5 mm. Concerns over the adverse effects of microplastics have led to a rapid growth in the available literature despite the lack of harmonized methods and materials. Therefore, the field is becoming increasingly daunting to new researchers. A state-of-the-art guide was assembled following a comprehensive literature review of microplastics research with the intent of addressing contemporary challenges, prioritized based on a survey, and introducing best practices. The lack of standardized methods and reference materials, the lack of access to analytical equipment, and the difficulty in working with lower environmental concentrations in laboratory tests (e.g., toxicity assays) remain a great challenge. The present work addresses these issues across three main sections: definitions, sampling, and evaluation of adverse effects. Harmonized methods and greater collaboration were identified as opportunities in this rapidly evolving field. A review of available interlaboratory comparison tests was also conducted to support additional recommendations.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper