0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Variability in the drivers of microplastic consumption by fish across four lake ecosystems

Frontiers in Earth Science 2024 9 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Peter Conowall, K. M. Schreiner, Joseph Marchand, Elizabeth C. Minor, Casey W. Schoenebeck, Melissa A. Maurer‐Jones, Thomas R. Hrabik

Summary

Researchers examined microplastic consumption by three fish species across four lakes in Minnesota and found that ingestion rates varied by species and feeding strategy. Filter-feeding fish consumed microplastics at rates that matched local water contamination levels, while visual feeders did not show the same pattern. The findings indicate that a fish's feeding behavior plays a major role in determining its microplastic exposure.

Study Type Environmental

Microplastic (<5 mm) pollution has been documented globally throughout freshwater and marine ecosystems. Exposure to and ingestion of microplastics presents a threat to the health of aquatic and marine organisms and humans through the consumption of fish and crustaceans. Understanding the factors which influence microplastic ingestion by fish is a key step in predicting the potential health risks. Drivers of microplastic consumption have been studied in lab settings, but there has been limited ability to confirm in field studies. Here we examine the roles and contributions of feeding guild, pelagic microplastic concentrations, and fish length to microplastic consumption by three species of fish across four lake ecosystems in Minnesota, United States. Fish samples were collected in the summers of 2019 and 2020 and processed to determine variability in microplastic ingestion. Identifying particles between 0.18 and 5 mm, plastic ingestion ranged from 0.6 microplastics fish −1 in Elk Lake (low surface water microplastics) bluegill to 1.09 microplastics fish -1 in White Iron Lake (moderate surface water microplastics) cisco. Results indicate that microplastic consumption by filter feeding cisco is driven by surface water microplastic concentrations, while microplastic consumption by visual feeding bluegill and yellow perch is not. Additionally, the high variability of ingestion between lake ecosystems coupled with the complex behavior of some fish species presents difficulties in identifying primary drivers of microplastic consumption that would be broadly applicable across ecosystems and species.

Share this paper