0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Estimation of spatio-temporal source of microplastics using Bayesian Neural networks

2024 Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou Ondřej Tichý, Ondřej Tichý, Ondřej Tichý, Ondřej Tichý, Václav Šmídl, Antonie Brožová, Nikolaos Evangeliou Václav Šmídl, Nikolaos Evangeliou Václav Šmídl, Nikolaos Evangeliou Ondřej Tichý, Nikolaos Evangeliou Václav Šmídl, Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou Václav Šmídl, Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou Ondřej Tichý, Václav Šmídl, Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou Ondřej Tichý, Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou Nikolaos Evangeliou

Summary

Researchers applied a spatial Bayesian neural network to solve the ill-posed inverse problem of estimating spatio-temporal sources of airborne microplastics, combining Western USA deposition measurements with the FLEXPART dispersion model to improve source estimation compared to conventional Bayesian methods.

Body Systems

Estimation of the source of airborne microplastics is a challenging inverse problem since the number of measurements is very small compared to the number of potential sources. The source is spatio-temporal and thus its estimation from a few measurements is severely ill-posed. Recent studies [1] solve this issue using Bayesian methods that introduce prior on the source term using additional assumptions of sparsity and smoothness. Here, deposition measurements of airborne microplastics and microfibers from the Western USA are combined with the FLEXPART atmospheric dispersion model to construct and solve the linear inverse problem. However, the posterior is obtained only approximately, with an underestimated variance of the estimate.In this contribution, we solve the same inverse problem as in [1] using a source term estimator in the form of a spatial Bayesian neural network [2]. We compare the obtained results with those obtained by the conventional methods. Since the ground truth for the microplastics is not available, the accuracy of the estimation cannot be assessed quantitatively. Therefore, we focus on qualitative comparison and sensitivity study with respect to initial conditions and hyper-parameters of the methods.Acknowledgment:This research has been supported by the Czech Science Foundation (grant no. GA24-10400S).References:[1] Evangeliou, N., Tichý, O., Eckhardt, S., Zwaaftink, C.G. and Brahney, J., 2022. Sources and fate of atmospheric microplastics revealed from inverse and dispersion modelling: From global emissions to deposition. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 432, p.128585.[2] Zammit-Mangion, A., Kaminski, M.D., Tran, B.H., Filippone, M. and Cressie, N., 2023. Spatial Bayesian Neural Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09491.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper