0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Toxicological Research on Nano and Microplastics in Environmental Pollution: Current Advances and Future Directions

Aquatic Toxicology 2024 43 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 70 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei Saurabh Shukla, Saurabh Shukla, De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei Yang Pei, Yang Pei, De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei Weiguo Li, De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei De‐Sheng Pei

Summary

This review summarizes existing research on how nano- and microplastics from our massive global plastic production enter aquatic environments, absorb harmful chemicals, and move through food chains into living organisms. Studies show these particles can cause brain damage, disrupt metabolism, trigger inflammation, and produce harmful oxidative stress in aquatic species, with microplastics even detected in commercial fish that people eat.

Body Systems

This review explains the sources of nanoplastics (NPs) and microplastics (MPs), their release, fate, and associated health risks in the aquatic environment. In the 21st century, scientists are grappling with a major challenge posed by MPs and NPs. The global production of plastic has skyrocketed from 1.5 million tons in the 1950s to an astonishing 390.7 million tons in 2021. This pervasive presence of these materials in our environment has spurred scientific inquiry into their potentially harmful effects on living organisms. Studies have revealed that while MPs, with their larger surface area, are capable of absorbing contaminants and pathogens from the surroundings, NPs can easily be transferred through the food chain. As a result, living organisms may ingest them and accumulate them within their bodies. Due to their minuscule size, NPs are particularly difficult to isolate and quantify. Furthermore, exposure to both NPs and MPs has been linked to various adverse health effects in aquatic species, including neurological impairments, disruption of lipid and energy metabolism, and increased susceptibility to cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, inflammation, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. It is alarming to note that MPs have even been detected in commercial fish, highlighting the severity of this issue. There are also challenges associated with elucidating the toxicological effects of NPs and MPs, which are discussed in detail in this review. In conclusion, plastic pollution is a pressing issue that governments should tackle by ensuring proper implementation of rules and regulations at national and provincial levels to reduce its health risks.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper