0
Systematic Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Informal recycling sector contribution to plastic pollution mitigation: A systematic scoping review and quantitative analysis of prevalence and productivity

2024 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Ed Cook, Ed Cook, Costas A. Velis Ed Cook, Nathalia Silva de Souza Lima Cano, Costas A. Velis Ed Cook, Ed Cook, Costas A. Velis Costas A. Velis Costas A. Velis Costas A. Velis Ed Cook, Costas A. Velis

Summary

This systematic review quantifies the role of informal waste pickers in reducing plastic pollution worldwide. The findings highlight that these workers prevent significant amounts of plastic from entering the environment, making their contributions essential to global efforts to reduce the microplastic contamination that ultimately affects human health.

<title>Abstract</title> Ongoing negotiations for a ‘Legally Binding Instrument on Plastic Pollution’ recognise the substantial contribution made by the informal recycling sector (IRS - waste pickers) to plastic pollution mitigation as part of just transition. Negotiating parties will require baseline evidence of the sector’s activities to inform the development of local and national actions plans. To this, we carried out a review of IRS prevalence and productivity following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) method followed by extensive (statistical) data analytics. Waste pickers represent median 0.2% (interquartile range – IQR: 0.1-0.5%) of the urban population worldwide, collecting between 20 kg and 80 kg of engineered materials for recycling each day, of which 30% (mean wt. ar) are plastics. We identify substantial shortcomings in most methodologies used to gather data on the IRS, introducing epistemic uncertainty into some previous estimates of the sector’s activity. We recommend development of a standardised resource-efficient method of sampling and data gathering, suitable for implementation at municipal/local scale. Our work offers verifiable quantitative knowledge on the sector’s activities to date, suitable for use in plastic pollution quantification models and local/national action plans required to baseline and monitor progress towards multilateral targets.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper