0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Ecosystem assessment of the Central Arctic Ocean: Description of human activities, its pressures, and vulnerability of the ecosystem

International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) 2026 Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Lis Lindal Jørgensen

Summary

Researchers conducted a comprehensive ecosystem assessment of the Central Arctic Ocean, identifying 11 direct human-induced pressures including marine litter and microplastics that reach the region through local activities and long-range transport via air, rivers, and ocean currents. The study evaluated the vulnerability of key Arctic species and ecological groups to these pressures. The findings highlight that even this remote ocean region faces significant contamination risks from microplastics and other pollutants originating far from the Arctic.

Study Type Environmental

The Central Arctic Ocean (CAO) is a fast-changing region due to global warming. In addition, it is affected by pressures that are the result of both local human activities, such as research and ship traffic from tourism and the military, and distant global sources that arrive via air, rivers, and ocean currents.Contaminants, non-indigenous species, marine litter (including microplastics), artificial noise pollution, nutrient and organic enrichment, extraction of species, extraction of non-living resources, physical seabed and sea ice disturbance, artificial light pollution, unintended injury and mortality in open water, and human presence on ice are the 11 local, direct human-induced pressures recognized as relevant for the CAO. Pressures from global sources include contaminants, litter, and non‑indigenous species that enter the ocean from outside the CAO. Both categories of pressure are included in this report. The impact of climate change originating from human activity (the pressure heating) is included as climate-related effects on the ecosystem.Ice prokaryotes and viruses, water column and seabed prokaryotes and viruses, ice algae, phytoplankton, ice invertebrates, zooplankton, pelagic squid, soft-bottom and hard-bottom benthos, sympagic-, mesopelagic-, and demersal/bentho-pelagic fishes, polar bear, ringed seal, bowhead whale, narwhal, beluga whale, transient-, seasonal resident- and ice obligate-sea birds were identified as groups or species that represent relevant ecosystem components of the CAO. Most of these taxonomic groups have populations that are widely distributed across the entire CAO, while a few groups have limited distributions on the seabed (hard-bottom benthos), in the water column (whales), or along the ice edge (ice-obligate seabirds and ringed seal). While most ecosystem components are present inside the CAO year-round, some few components (whales and migratory and seasonally resident seabirds) are only present for a few months each year.Some of the relevant pressures introduced by local sources in the CAO are anticipated to have impacts on all (e.g. contaminants), some (e.g. artificial noise pollution), or only a few (e.g. nutrient and organic enrichment) ecosystem components in the CAO.This report is part II to CRR Vol. 355 - Ecosystem assessment of the Central Arctic Ocean: Description of the ecosystem.Erratum 19/02/26: Spelling of author name corrected.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Ecosystem assessment of the Central Arctic Ocean: Description of human activities, its pressures, and vulnerability of the ecosystem

Researchers assessed human activities and their environmental pressures on the Central Arctic Ocean ecosystem, identifying 11 direct human-induced pressures including contaminants, marine litter with microplastics, and ship traffic. The study found that pollutants and microplastics reach this remote region via air, rivers, and ocean currents from distant global sources, in addition to local activities like research and tourism. The assessment highlights the vulnerability of Arctic ecosystems to these combined pressures as the region undergoes rapid change from global warming.

Article Tier 2

Ecosystem assessment of the Central Arctic Ocean: Description of human activities, its pressures, and vulnerability of the ecosystem

This ecosystem assessment of the Central Arctic Ocean described human activities—including research, tourism, and military shipping—and evaluated the cumulative environmental pressures from both local sources and distant global pollution including microplastics transported via air and ocean currents.

Article Tier 2

Pollution in the Arctic Ocean: An overview of multiple pressures and implications for ecosystem services

Researchers reviewed the multiple environmental pressures facing the Arctic Ocean, including a complex mix of chemical pollutants, climate change, and fishing activity, finding that current policies and data are insufficient to assess their combined impacts on fragile Arctic ecosystems. The study calls for targeted Arctic research and updated monitoring frameworks to better protect the region's ecosystem services — which include food, climate regulation, and global trade routes.

Article Tier 2

Plastic litter in the European Arctic: What do we know?

Researchers reviewed available evidence on plastic litter in the European Arctic, finding that despite limited data, microplastics are present in every environmental compartment — including sea ice — and are being transported to this remote region from distant sources via ocean currents and wind.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in Surface Waters of the Russian Arctic Seas: Distribution, Concentration, Identification, and Eco-Risks for Fish

Microplastics were detected across surface waters of the Russian Arctic seas, with concentrations and polymer types varying by region and season. The findings document that even high-latitude Arctic waters are not spared from microplastic contamination, likely transported by ocean currents and rivers.

Share this paper