0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Modelling the effect of shape on atmospheric microplastic transport

Atmospheric Environment 2024 25 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 65 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
E.G. Ward, Mark Gordon, Liisa M. Jantunen Liisa M. Jantunen Liisa M. Jantunen Mark Gordon, Liisa M. Jantunen Liisa M. Jantunen Liisa M. Jantunen Ronald Hanson, Mark Gordon, E.G. Ward, Mark Gordon, Ronald Hanson, Liisa M. Jantunen Liisa M. Jantunen Liisa M. Jantunen Liisa M. Jantunen Liisa M. Jantunen Liisa M. Jantunen Liisa M. Jantunen E.G. Ward, Ronald Hanson, Ronald Hanson, Liisa M. Jantunen Liisa M. Jantunen Liisa M. Jantunen Liisa M. Jantunen

Summary

Using atmospheric transport modeling, researchers showed that the shape of microplastic particles significantly affects how far they travel through the air. Long fibers can spread over a 32% larger area than spherical particles of the same size, and shape matters most for particles larger than 6 micrometers. Since particles in the 6 to 10 micrometer range can reach deep into human lungs, accurately accounting for shape is important for predicting where airborne microplastics end up and who might be breathing them in.

Microplastics are particles less than 5 mm in size and are a growing scientific concern, given the potential harm caused across ecosystems as a result of the global use of plastics. Most microplastics are non-spherical in shape, however, most atmospheric modelling studies to date treat microplastics as simple spheres when assessing transport. To further understand the effects of shape and size on atmospheric microplastic transport, the HYSPLIT model was utilized to identify potential differences. It was shown that the extent of microplastic transport and deposition varied significantly by shape for particles larger than 6 μm, but for particles smaller than 6 μm, the differences were not significant. Long fibres deposited over a 32% greater area than spherical particles at the largest equivalent size of 23.5 μm. The maximum deposition area occurred for particles with an equivalent size of 4.5 μm, varying in deposition area by less than 0.25% by the shapes considered. As particles smaller than 10 μm have a large potential to cause adverse health effects and shape affects transport in the 6 μm–10 μm size range, accurately modelling the shape of atmospheric microplastic transport is crucial to determining the range and amount of deposition globally.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper