0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

The release, degradation, and distribution of PVC microplastic-originated phthalate and non-phthalate plasticizers in sediments

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2024 43 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Gayatri Panthi, Gayatri Panthi, Rishikesh Bajagain, Rishikesh Bajagain, Pil-Gon Kim Pil-Gon Kim Pil-Gon Kim Pil-Gon Kim Dhiraj Kumar Chaudhary, Pil-Gon Kim Pil-Gon Kim Jung-Hwan Kwon, Jung-Hwan Kwon, Jung-Hwan Kwon, Jung-Hwan Kwon, Yongseok Hong, Jung-Hwan Kwon, Jung-Hwan Kwon, Yongseok Hong, Pil-Gon Kim

Summary

This study examined how chemical additives called plasticizers leach out of PVC microplastics into surrounding sediment. Researchers found that 35-79% of plasticizers were released from the microplastics within 30 days, and specific bacteria in the sediment helped break them down. This matters because PVC is one of the most common plastics, and its microplastic fragments are continuously releasing potentially harmful chemicals into the environment that can enter the food chain.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

This study investigated the leaching of phthalate and non-phthalate plasticizers from polyvinyl chloride microplastics (MPs) into sediment and their degradation over a 30-d period via abiotic and biotic processes. The results showed that 3579% of plasticizers were released into the sediment from the MPs and > 99.9% degradation was achieved. Although a significantly higher degradation was found in plasticizer-added microcosms under biotic processes (overall, 94%), there was a noticeable abiotic loss (72%), suggesting that abiotic processes also play a role in plasticizer degradation. Interestingly, when compared with the initial sediment-water partitioning for plasticizers, the partition constants for low-molecular-weight compounds decreased in both microcosms, whereas those for high-molecular-weight compounds increased after abiotic degradation. Furthermore, changes in the bacterial community, abundance of plasticizer-degrading bacterial populations, and functional gene profiles were assessed. In all the microcosms, a decrease in bacterial community diversity and a notable shift in bacterial composition were observed. The enriched potential plasticizer-degrading bacteria were Arthrobacter, Bacillus, Desulfovibrio, Desulfuromonas, Devosia, Gordonia, Mycobacterium, and Sphingomonas, among which Bacillus was recognized as the key plasticizer degrader. Overall, these findings shed light on the factors affecting plasticizer degradation, the microbial communities potentially involved in biodegradation, and the fate of plasticizers in the environment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper