0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Knowledge, use and acceptability of menstrual cup: an explorative study among women health professionals in Kerala, India

International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health 2024 5 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
V. M. Anjana, V. T. Jissa, GK Mini

Summary

Researchers surveyed women health professionals in Kerala, India, about their knowledge, use, and acceptance of menstrual cups as a menstrual management option. They found that while awareness was relatively high among health professionals, actual usage remained low due to comfort concerns and lack of practical guidance. The study highlights the potential of menstrual cups as a reusable, waste-reducing alternative to disposable menstrual products that contribute to plastic pollution.

Models

Background: Globally, despite a long history of invention and safety measures, the menstrual cup is not a widely used method of menstrual management among women. As comprehensive evidence on the menstrual cup use is relatively limited in India, this study aimed to describe the knowledge, use, and acceptability of menstrual cup among women health professionals in Kerala, India. Methods: We conducted a web-based cross-sectional survey among adult menstruating women health professionals. Information on knowledge of menstrual cups, pattern of use and acceptability of menstrual cups, and factors associated with the usage of menstrual cups were collected. Qualitative interviews were also conducted among current, discontinued and non-users of menstrual cup. Results: Of the 346 women studied, the majority (97%) of the participants were acquainted with menstrual cups. Ever use of a menstrual cup was reported by 34.7% of participants. Currently, women mainly used sanitary pads (73%), followed by the menstrual cup (26%) as the main menstrual hygiene product. The quantitative and qualitative analysis showed a high level of acceptability among users of menstrual cups and perceptible restraints among non-users. Environment safety and affordability were the most appealing factors for menstrual cup use. Conclusions: Nearly a fourth of health professionals in the study were currently using the menstrual cup. A high level of overall knowledge and acceptability among the users of the menstrual cup as seen in the study is likely to motivate and enhance better choice of menstrual products among women in general.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Systematic Review Tier 1

Effect Of Use Menstrual Cup To Personal Hygiene And Genital Inflammation : Systematic Literature Review

This systematic review of 12 studies found that menstrual cups are a safe and effective alternative to disposable sanitary products, with no increased risk of genital inflammation and potential benefits for personal hygiene when used correctly. The findings suggest menstrual cups can reduce exposure to chemicals found in conventional menstrual products. This is relevant to microplastic concerns because disposable pads and tampons contain synthetic materials that can release microplastic fibers, while reusable silicone menstrual cups generate significantly less plastic waste.

Article Tier 2

Assessment of Knowledge Regarding Management and Disposal of Sanitary Napkins in Udaipur City, India

This study investigated knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding sanitary napkin disposal among women in Udaipur, India, where plastic-containing disposable napkins create significant menstrual waste management challenges. Inadequate disposal infrastructure was identified as contributing to health and environmental risks from accumulated sanitary waste.

Meta Analysis Tier 1

A planetary health perspective on menstruation: menstrual equity and climate action

This planetary health review highlights how conventional menstrual hygiene products generate significant plastic waste and contain potentially harmful chemicals, while many people worldwide lack adequate access to menstrual products. Reusable and sustainable alternatives could simultaneously address menstrual equity and reduce environmental plastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

A Study into Public Awareness of the Environmental Impact of Menstrual Products and Product Choice

This study investigated public awareness of the plastic content and environmental impact of menstrual products, finding through surveys and focus groups that most participants were unaware of the hidden plastics in disposable items. Results showed that greater environmental awareness does not reliably translate into choosing less harmful product alternatives.

Article Tier 2

Menstruation: Environmental impact and need for global health equity

This paper highlights the environmental impact of disposable menstrual products as a source of plastic waste and calls for greater awareness and equitable access to sustainable menstrual hygiene options. The study frames menstrual health equity as both a public health and environmental issue requiring global attention.

Share this paper