0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Field and laboratory microplastics uptake by a freshwater shrimp

Ecology and Evolution 2024 15 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Masimini S. Nkosi, Masimini S. Nkosi, Ross N. Cuthbert Tatenda Dalu, Tatenda Dalu, Tatenda Dalu, Tatenda Dalu, Tatenda Dalu, Tatenda Dalu, Ross N. Cuthbert Tatenda Dalu, Tatenda Dalu, Ross N. Cuthbert Ross N. Cuthbert Ross N. Cuthbert Ross N. Cuthbert Ross N. Cuthbert Ross N. Cuthbert Ross N. Cuthbert Ross N. Cuthbert Tatenda Dalu, Tatenda Dalu, Tatenda Dalu, Tatenda Dalu, Tatenda Dalu, Tatenda Dalu, Masimini S. Nkosi, Tatenda Dalu, Tatenda Dalu, Tatenda Dalu, Ross N. Cuthbert Tatenda Dalu, Tatenda Dalu, Ross N. Cuthbert Ross N. Cuthbert Tatenda Dalu, Ross N. Cuthbert Ross N. Cuthbert Ross N. Cuthbert Ross N. Cuthbert Tatenda Dalu, Tatenda Dalu, Tatenda Dalu, Tatenda Dalu, Ross N. Cuthbert Tatenda Dalu, Tatenda Dalu, Tatenda Dalu, Ross N. Cuthbert Tatenda Dalu, Tatenda Dalu, Ross N. Cuthbert

Summary

Both field surveys and laboratory experiments confirmed that freshwater shrimp readily take in microplastics, with wild shrimp averaging about 6 particles per individual and lab shrimp accumulating up to 20 particles in just six hours. Fibers made up 86% of the microplastics found in wild shrimp. Since these shrimp are part of the aquatic food web, their microplastic uptake means contamination can transfer to larger fish and ultimately to humans who consume freshwater species.

Study Type Environmental

Microplastics are widespread pollutants, but few studies have linked field prevalence in organisms to laboratory uptakes. Aquatic filter feeders may be particularly susceptible to microplastic uptake, with the potential for trophic transfer to higher levels, including humans. Here, we surveyed microplastics from a model freshwater shrimp, common caraidina (<i>Caridina nilotica</i>) inhabiting the Crocodile River in South Africa to better understand microplastic uptake rates per individual. We then use functional response analysis (feeding rate as a function of resource density) to quantify uptake rates by shrimps in the laboratory. We found that microplastics were widespread in <i>C. nilotica</i>, with no significant differences in microplastic abundances among sampled sites under varying land uses, with an average abundance of 6.2 particles per individual. The vast majority of microplastics found was fibres (86.1%). Shrimp microplastic accumulation patterns were slightly higher in the laboratory than the field, where shrimp exhibited a hyperbolic Type II functional response model under varying exposure concentrations. Maximum feeding rates of 20 particles were found over a 6 h feeding period, and uptake evidenced at even the lowest laboratory concentrations (~10 particles per mL). These results highlight that microplastic uptake is widespread in field populations and partly density dependent, with field concentrations corroborating uptake rates recorded in the laboratory. Further research is required to elucidate trophic transfer from these taxa and to understand potential physiological impacts.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper