We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Framework to Quantify Uncertainty in Microplastic Concentrations in Wastewaters and Sludges Incorporating Analytical Recovery Information into Data Analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed a probabilistic framework for quantifying uncertainty in microplastic concentration estimates from wastewater sampling, accounting for variability in sampling protocols, analytical methods, and particle definition thresholds. Applying the framework revealed that reported concentrations can vary by orders of magnitude depending on methodological choices, underscoring the need for standardization.
Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) serve a pivotal role in transferring microplastics (MPs) from wastewater to sludge streams, thereby exerting a significant influence on their release into the environment and establishing wastewater and biosolids as vectors for MP transport and delivery. Hence, an accurate understanding of the fate and transport of MPs in WWTPs is vital. Enumeration is commonly used to estimate concentrations of MPs in performance evaluations of treatment processes, and risk assessment also typically involves MP enumeration. However, achieving high accuracy in concentration estimates is challenging due to inherent uncertainty in the analytical workflow to collect and process samples and count MPs. Here, sources of random error in MP enumeration in wastewater and other matrices were investigated using a modeling approach that addresses the sources of error associated with each step of the analysis. In particular, losses are reflected in data analysis rather than merely being measured as a validation step for MP extraction methods. A model for addressing uncertainty in the enumeration of microorganisms in water was adapted to include key assumptions relevant to the enumeration of MPs in wastewater. Critically, analytical recovery, the capacity to successfully enumerate particles considering losses and counting error, may be variable among MPs due to differences in size, shape, and type (differential analytical recovery) in addition to random variability between samples (nonconstant analytical recovery). Accordingly, differential analytical recovery among the categories of MPs was added to the existing model. This model was illustratively applied to estimate MP concentrations from simulated data and quantify uncertainty in the resulting estimates. Increasing the number of replicates, counting categories of MPs separately, and accounting for both differential and nonconstant analytical recovery improved the accuracy of MP enumeration. This work contributes to developing guidelines for analytical procedures quantifying MPs in diverse types of samples and provides a framework for enhanced interpretation of enumeration data, thereby facilitating the collection of more accurate and reliable MP data in environmental studies.
More Papers Like This
Hide-and-seek: Threshold values and contribution towards better understanding of recovery rate in microplastic research
AI summary Read the abstract
This study examines how recovery rate methodology in microplastic research affects reported contamination levels, finding that inconsistent use of threshold values and positive controls across studies introduces substantial variability in microplastic concentration estimates and undermines cross-study comparisons.
Validation of Sample Preparation Methods for Microplastic Analysis in Wastewater Matrices—Reproducibility and Standardization
AI summary Read the abstract
Sample preparation methods for microplastic analysis in wastewater were validated against reference standards to assess recovery rates and reproducibility. The validation study identified methods that reliably extract microplastics from complex wastewater matrices, supporting more consistent environmental monitoring of microplastic discharge from treatment plants.
Factors Controlling Microplastic Concentrations and Polymer Profiles in Wastewater, Storm Water, and Surface Water
AI summary Read the abstract
A critical review of 143 studies found that microplastic concentrations in wastewater span eight orders of magnitude, with the highest levels in the smallest particle size fractions, while polyethylene and polypropylene are the most commonly detected polymers across freshwater systems. The wide variation is largely an artifact of inconsistent sampling, extraction, and analytical methods, making direct comparisons between studies unreliable and complicating decisions about water treatment and regulation.
Methods to recover and characterize microplastics in wastewater treatment plants
AI summary Read the abstract
This review systematically examines methods used to recover and characterize microplastics from wastewater treatment plants, identifying key methodological challenges including inconsistent extraction procedures, contamination risks, and varying identification techniques that complicate cross-study comparisons. The authors provide recommendations for standardizing WWTP microplastic analysis to improve the reliability and comparability of removal efficiency data.
Developing improved methodologies for the quantification of microplastics in wastewater treatment plant effluent and sludge
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed improved sampling methods for quantifying microplastics in wastewater treatment plant effluent and sewage sludge, addressing the lack of standardized protocols that has hampered cross-study comparison. The new methodology aims to better characterize WWTPs as sources of microplastic pollution in freshwater environments.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.