0
Systematic Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Leveraging AI to improve evidence synthesis in conservation

2024 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Ulrika Candolin, Oded Berger‐Tal, Alison L. Greggor, Malgorzata Lagisz, Ulrika Candolin, Oded Berger‐Tal, Bob B. M. Wong, Daniel T. Blumstein, Carrie Ann Adams, Shinichi Nakagawa Daniel T. Blumstein, Ulrika Candolin, Matthew Gibson, Alison L. Greggor, Malgorzata Lagisz, Bilana Macura, Bob B. M. Wong, Bilana Macura, Catherine J. Price, Catherine J. Price, Breanna Putman, Breanna Putman, Shinichi Nakagawa Lysanne Snijders, Ulrika Candolin, Shinichi Nakagawa Ulrika Candolin, Ulrika Candolin, Malgorzata Lagisz, Bob B. M. Wong, Shinichi Nakagawa

Summary

This review examines how large language models and other AI tools can accelerate systematic evidence synthesis in conservation science, which is traditionally expensive and slow. While not specific to microplastics, the approach is directly relevant to the growing challenge of synthesizing the rapidly expanding body of microplastic research literature.

Systematic evidence syntheses (systematic reviews and maps) summarize knowledge and are used to support decisions and policies in a variety of applied fields, from medicine and public health to biodiversity conservation. However, conducting these exercises in conservation is often expensive and slow, which can impede their use and hamper progress in addressing the biodiversity crisis. With the explosive growth of large language models (LLM) and other forms of artificial intelligence (AI), we discuss the promise and perils associated with their use. We conclude that, when judiciously used, AI has the potential to speed up and hopefully improve the process of evidence synthesis, which can be particularly useful for underfunded applied fields such as conservation science.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper