0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Airborne microplastics: environmental prevalence, human health risks, and mitigation strategies

Analytical Methods 2026 Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Tanvir Arfin, Payal A. Nakhate

Summary

This critical review synthesized findings from 156 peer-reviewed papers on airborne microplastics, covering sampling methodologies, environmental prevalence, health hazards, and mitigation strategies. Researchers found that atmospheric microplastic concentrations vary widely across environments and highlighted significant gaps in toxicological research regarding human health effects from inhaled microplastic particles.

This critical review aims to (1) summarize methodologies for sampling and characterizing atmospheric microplastics (MPs), (2) evaluate their environmental prevalence and associated health hazards, (3) highlight deficiencies in toxicological research, and (4) provide strategies for mitigation. Atmospheric MPs (smaller than 5 mm) represent an emerging air pollution threat with significant health implications. This review consolidates findings from 156 peer-reviewed papers published between 2000 and 2025, reporting airborne MP concentrations ranging from 370 particles m-2 day-1 in the Pyrenees to 600 particles m-2 day-1 in urban areas of China. Synthetic fabrics account for 29-66% of atmospheric fibres, while tyre wear is the main source of larger fragments. MPs can remain airborne for 1 to 6.5 days, allowing for transcontinental distribution to remote regions such as the Arctic and Pyrenees via wind patterns. Vegetation acts as a temporary reservoir for MPs before they are ultimately deposited in soil and water, contributing to up to 80% of oceanic MPs in certain areas. Annual human inhalation exposure is estimated to exceed 1 million particles, and occupational studies have linked polyvinyl chloride (PVC)/polypropylene (PP) dust to interstitial lung disease and a 3.6-fold increase in respiratory symptoms. The research is crucial for addressing current gaps in toxicological knowledge and for developing effective mitigation strategies. Highlighting the gap in studying inhaled airborne MPs can inspire researchers to focus on this vital area, making them feel that their work is impactful and needed. There is a significant gap in the study of the toxicity of inhaled airborne MPs, with implications for toxicological investigations. Significant deficiencies remain in understanding the toxicological effects of airborne MP inhalation, ocular surface impacts, and atmospheric transition chemistry. Mitigation necessitates the control of sources (textile filters and tyre recycling) in conjunction with sophisticated detection methods (FTIR, Raman, Py-GC/MS). Urgent incorporation of policy measures into air quality standards is necessary to tackle this widespread atmospheric pollutant issue.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Characteristics, Toxic Effects, and Analytical Methods of Microplastics in the Atmosphere

This review summarizes current knowledge about the distribution, sources, and fate of microplastics in the atmosphere, along with their potential toxic effects on animals and humans. Researchers identified significant gaps in both quantitative analysis methods and understanding of the mechanisms behind inhaled microplastic toxicity. The study calls for improved sampling and characterization techniques to better assess the health risks of airborne microplastic exposure.

Review Tier 2

A review of atmospheric microplastics pollution: In-depth sighting of sources, analytical methods, physiognomies, transport and risks

This review provides an in-depth analysis of atmospheric microplastic pollution, examining sources, detection methods, physical characteristics, transport mechanisms, and health risks. Researchers found that indoor environments tend to contain higher concentrations of airborne microplastics than outdoor settings, and that current detection methods are limited in their ability to capture the smallest particles. The study emphasizes the need for standardized sampling procedures and more research into the health effects of inhaling microplastic particles.

Article Tier 2

Airborne microplastics: Occurrence, sources, fate, risks and mitigation

This review compiles findings from over 140 studies on airborne microplastics, covering their sources, distribution, and health risks in both indoor and outdoor environments. Researchers found that indoor environments often have higher microplastic concentrations than outdoor air, with textiles and building materials being major sources. The study highlights growing evidence that inhaled microplastics may pose respiratory health risks and calls for standardized measurement methods.

Article Tier 2

Atmospheric Microplastics: Perspectives on Origin, Abundances, Ecological and Health Risks

This review summarizes current knowledge about microplastics in the atmosphere, including their sources, how far they travel, and potential health effects from inhalation. Researchers found that airborne microplastics can carry toxic chemicals deep into the respiratory system and may contribute to respiratory problems and other health concerns. The study emphasizes that atmospheric microplastic pollution remains poorly understood due to a lack of standardized measurement methods.

Review Tier 2

Emerging environmental challenge: a critical review of airborne microplastics

This review provides a comprehensive assessment of airborne microplastic pollution, covering their sources, distribution in indoor and outdoor environments, and potential health effects. Researchers found that airborne microplastics are present in diverse settings from homes to remote mountain regions, with textile fibers being the most common type. The study highlights that understanding the health risks of inhaling these particles remains an urgent research priority.

Share this paper