0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Remediation Sign in to save

Understanding microplastic presence in different wastewater treatment processes: Removal efficiency and source identification

The Science of The Total Environment 2024 22 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Xin Liu, Min Ma, Mukhtiar Ali, Bin Wang Frédéric Coulon, Mingxin Huo, Mingxin Huo, Bin Wang Bin Wang Bin Wang Bin Wang Bin Wang Frédéric Coulon, Zhiwen Tang, Frédéric Coulon, Xin Song, Xin Song, Bin Wang Bin Wang Frédéric Coulon, Bin Wang Xin Liu, Zhiwen Tang, Bin Wang Bin Wang Bin Wang Mukhtiar Ali, Mukhtiar Ali, Bin Wang Zhian Ying, Xin Liu, Zhiwen Tang, Zhiwen Tang, Zhian Ying, Zhiwen Tang, Zhiwen Tang, Zhian Ying, Zhian Ying, Mukhtiar Ali, Bin Wang Xin Liu, Xin Liu, Bin Wang Xin Song, Bin Wang Zhian Ying, Zhian Ying, Zhian Ying, Zhian Ying, Bin Wang Bin Wang Frédéric Coulon, Bin Wang Xin Song, Bin Wang Bin Wang Mingxin Huo, Xin Song, Mingxin Huo, Bin Wang

Summary

Researchers tracked microplastic removal across different treatment stages at two wastewater treatment plants and found overall removal rates of 90% and 97%. They discovered that population density in the served area was a bigger driver of influent microplastic levels than sewage volume, and that activated sludge served as the primary trap for captured particles. The study identified laundry washing and daily consumer products as the main sources of microplastics entering the treatment plants.

Study Type Environmental

Municipal effluents discharged from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are a considerable source of microplastics in the environment. The dynamic profiles of microplastics in treatment units in WWTPs with different treatment processes remain unclear. This study quantitatively analyzed microplastics in wastewater samples collected from different treatment units in two tertiary treatment plants with distinct processes. The influents contained an average of 15.5 ± 3.5 particles/L and 38.5 ± 2.5 particles/L in the two WWTPs with in the oxidation ditch process and the integrated fixed-film activated sludge process, respectively. Interestingly, microplastic concentrations in the influent were more influenced by the population density in the served area than sewage volume or served population equivalent. Throughout the treatment process, concentrations were reduced to 1.5 ± 0.5 particles/L and 1.0 ± 1.0 particles/L in the final effluents, representing an overall decrease of 90% and 97%, in WWTPs with the oxidation ditch process and integrated fixed-film activated sludge process, respectively. A significant proportion of the microplastics were removed during the primary treatment stage in both WWTPs, with better performance for foam, film, line-shaped and large-sized microplastics. Most microplastics were accumulated in activated sludge, indicating its key role as the primary sink in WWTPs. The multiple correspondence analysis identified laundry washing and daily necessities such as packaging and containers as the major contributors to microplastics in WWTPs. The study proposed recommendations for upgrading WWTPs, modifying designs, and implementing strategies to reduce microplastic sources, aiming to minimize the release of microplastics into the environment. These findings can shed lights on the sources of microplastics in WWTPs, and advance our understanding of the mechanisms for more effective microplastic removals in wastewater treatment technologies in future applications.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper