0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Atmospheric deposition studies of microplastics in Central Germany

Air Quality Atmosphere & Health 2024 28 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Sarmite Kernchen, Holger Schmalz, Martin G. J. Löder, Christoph Georgi, Andrej Einhorn, Andreas Greiner, A. C. Nölscher, Christian Laforsch, Andreas Held

Summary

Researchers monitored microplastic particles falling from the air in Central Germany over eight months and detected plastic in all wet deposition (rain) samples and half of dry deposition samples, with polypropylene being the most common type. A deeper Raman analysis revealed that standard detection methods may underestimate actual microplastic air pollution by at least ten times, highlighting a large blind spot in atmospheric monitoring.

Polymers

Abstract Emission of microplastics (MP) to the atmosphere, airborne transport, and subsequent deposition are now recognized. However, the temporal and spatial resolution of data on MP pollution and knowledge of their atmospheric behaviour and fate is still very limited. Hence, we investigated MP wet and dry deposition in Central Germany and examined the role of weather conditions on MP contamination levels. Monthly samples of dry and wet deposition were taken over an eight-month period (05/2019-12/2019) and analysed by micro-Fourier-Transform Infrared spectroscopy (µFTIR) down to 11 μm particle size and one dry deposition sample was subjected to Raman analysis to determine plastic particles down to a size of 0.5 μm. MP in a size range from 11 μm to 130 μm were detected in all wet deposition samples and in 4 out of 8 dry deposition samples by µFTIR. Polypropylene particles were found most frequently and accounted for 62% and 54% of all particles in wet and dry deposition samples, respectively. Over the eight-month period, wet deposition of MP slightly dominated at the study site and comprised 59% of the total MP deposition. The MP mean total (wet + dry) deposition flux (DF) was 17 ± 14 MP m − 2 day − 1 . Extensive Raman analyses of an exemplary dry deposition sample revealed additional plastic particles in the extended size range from 1 to 10 μm resulting in a deposition flux of 207 MP m − 2 day − 1 . Our results suggest that MP analysis by µFTIR down to 11 μm may underestimate DF at least by an order of magnitude. More comprehensive studies on submicron plastics and nanoplastics are needed to fully assess air pollution by plastic particles.

Share this paper