0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Microplastics in freshwater: Unveiling sources, fate, and removal strategies

Groundwater for Sustainable Development 2024 30 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 65 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Sweta Upadhyay, Rachan Karmakar, Vijay Tripathi, Kanika Dogra, Manish Kumar, Prosun Bhattacharya, Pradeep Kumar Sharma

Summary

This review of 167 studies examines the sources, distribution, and fate of microplastics in freshwater systems worldwide. Key sources include improperly disposed plastic waste, synthetic fabrics, and personal care products, and these particles act as carriers for heavy metals, pesticides, and antibiotic-resistant bacteria -- collectively posing potential cancer and other health risks through contaminated drinking water and food.

Study Type Environmental

In aquatic environments, microplastics pose alarming threat to the environment since they actively convey hazardous contaminants and aggregate into biota. Although studies on microplastics in freshwater ecosystems have increased recently, there are still many concerns about the origins, sources, fate, and distribution of MPs. This thorough review includes 167 studies (2017–2024) with an aim to provide knowledge of the type, sources, and detection of microplastics in freshwater ecosystems, along with their consequences on aquatic species and human health. The main sources of microplastic in freshwater ecosystems include improperly disposed plastic trash, industrial raw materials, personal care items, and synthetic fabrics. Factors like retention time, flow rate, and seasonal variations influence their permanence in freshwater (FW) ecosystems, ultimately leading to their transport through river networks. The most hazardous polymers identified are PUR, PAN, PVC, Epoxy resin, and ABS. Previous studies have confirmed their ‘Trojan horse effect’ due to their ability to adorb drugs (e.g., acyclovir, atenolol, sulfamethoxazole, and ibuprofen), heavy metals (As, Cd), pesticides (difenoconazole, buprofezin, imidacloprid), antibiotic-resistant genes and microorganisms. Microplastics carrying above pollutants may possess carcinogenic properties and other health risks, considering their entry into the human body through FW-sourced water and food products. Currently, there is a lack of standardized protocols for the identification, assessment, and quantification of MPs in freshwater ecosystems. The common identification techniques are spectroscopy, Microscopy, mass spectroscopy, and novel methods like staining and AFM-IR spectroscopy. The multifaceted impact of microplastics on FW ecosystems, from contaminant transmission to human health, underscores the intricate interactions within this environmental challenge. • Microplastics are categorized as primary and secondary based on origin. • Microplastics are measured via FTIR, Raman, SEM/EDX, GC-MS, visual microscopy. • Microplastics possess the Trojan horse effect due to their adsorbent surface. • Microplastic removal includes ultrafiltration, photo-catalysis, biodegradation.

Share this paper

Discussion

Log in to join the discussion

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.