0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Mapping Plastic and Plastic Additive Cycles in Coastal Countries: A Norwegian Case Study

Environmental Science & Technology 2024 16 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Ahmed Marhoon, Francesca Verones Ahmed Marhoon, Ahmed Marhoon, Miguel Las Heras Hernández, Ahmed Marhoon, Francesca Verones Francesca Verones Francesca Verones Francesca Verones Francesca Verones Romain G. Billy, Francesca Verones Daniel B. Müller, Francesca Verones Francesca Verones Francesca Verones Francesca Verones Francesca Verones Francesca Verones Francesca Verones Francesca Verones Francesca Verones Francesca Verones

Summary

Researchers developed a comprehensive method using dynamic probabilistic material flow analysis to map the entire plastic cycle in Norway, including 232 plastic additives. For the first time, they modeled the progressive leaching of microplastics during the use phase of consumer products. The study provides a detailed picture of how plastic polymers and their chemical additives move through coastal economies and eventually reach the environment.

Study Type Environmental

The growing environmental consequences caused by plastic pollution highlight the need for a better understanding of plastic polymer cycles and their associated additives. We present a novel, comprehensive top-down method using inflow-driven dynamic probabilistic material flow analysis (DPMFA) to map the plastic cycle in coastal countries. For the first time, we covered the progressive leaching of microplastics to the environment during the use phase of products and modeled the presence of 232 plastic additives. We applied this methodology to Norway and proposed initial release pathways to different environmental compartments. 758 kt of plastics distributed among 13 different polymers was introduced to the Norwegian economy in 2020, 4.4 Mt was present in in-use stocks, and 632 kt was wasted, of which 15.2 kt (2.4%) was released to the environment with a similar share of macro- and microplastics and 4.8 kt ended up in the ocean. Our study shows tire wear rubber as a highly pollutive microplastic source, while most macroplastics originated from consumer packaging with LDPE, PP, and PET as dominant polymers. Additionally, 75 kt of plastic additives was potentially released to the environment alongside these polymers. We emphasize that upstream measures, such as consumption reduction and changes in product design, would result in the most positive impact for limiting plastic pollution.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper