We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastics from biodegradable mulching films affect soil physicochemical properties and earthworm reproduction, but not microarthropod communities
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers studied the long-term effects of biodegradable mulching film microplastics on soil properties and soil organisms in a 13-week controlled mesocosm experiment. The study found that even the lowest concentration of microplastics (0.025%) significantly altered soil pH and aggregate structure, and higher concentrations reduced earthworm reproduction. However, springtail communities were not affected, suggesting different soil organisms have varying sensitivity to biodegradable microplastics.
Agricultural mulching films represent a major source of microplastics (MPs; defined as particles 1 μm-5 mm in size) in soils. With a projected exponential increase of the global use of agricultural mulching films, concentrations of MPs in soil are bound to increase. Short-term single species toxicity tests using mulching film-based MPs showed effects on soil invertebrates at high concentrations, up to 5 % (w/w dry soil), as well as on soil physicochemical properties. This study aimed to provide insight into the long-term effects of mulching film-based MPs by simulating an agricultural growing season in a highly controlled mesocosm system called CLIMECS. Eight replicate constructed cores of Lufa 2.2 soil spiked with 0 % (control), 0.025 %, 0.05 %, 0.2 % or 0.8 % starch-polybutadiene adipate terephthalate MPs received a constant springtail community (Heteromurus nitidus, Protaphorura fimata and Sinella curviseta), two species of earthworm (Aporrectodea caliginosa and Lumbricus rubellus), cress (Lepidium sativum) as vegetation cover, and lettuce (Lactuca sativa) as a crop. After 13 weeks incubation, soil pH and smaller soil aggregate fractions were significantly decreased already at the lowest exposure concentration of 0.025 % MPs compared to the control (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). Springtail community composition did not show differences between treatments. Earthworm survival was not affected by the MPs, but total earthworm reproduction was lower at 0.2 % and 0.8 % MPs compared to the 0.05 % treatment. This study showed that MPs derived from biodegradable mulching film plastics may affect soil physicochemical properties and earthworm reproduction at environmentally relevant concentrations.
More Papers Like This
Microplastics from biodegradable mulching films affect soil physicochemical properties and earthworm reproduction, but not microarthropod communities
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers conducted a 13-week mesocosm study examining the effects of biodegradable mulching film microplastics on soil properties and invertebrate communities. They found that even low concentrations (0.025%) significantly altered soil pH and aggregate structure, and earthworm reproduction was reduced at higher concentrations, while springtail communities showed no measurable differences between treatments.
Microplastics originated from agricultural mulching films affect enchytraeid multigeneration reproduction and soil properties
AI summary Read the abstract
This study tested microplastics from real agricultural mulching films, both conventional polyethylene and biodegradable types, on small soil worms over multiple generations. Even biodegradable film microplastics reduced worm reproduction and altered soil properties like pH and water-holding capacity. The results show that microplastics from agricultural plastics, including supposedly eco-friendly alternatives, can harm soil organisms and threaten long-term soil health and food production.
Different mulch films, consistent results: soil fauna responses to microplastic
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists compared how conventional polyethylene and biodegradable PLA/PBAT microplastics affect earthworms and springtails in soil over 28 days. Neither plastic type significantly harmed reproduction, but subtle cellular stress responses were detected, and the effects were similar for both conventional and biodegradable plastics, suggesting that biodegradable alternatives may not be safer for soil organisms.
Soil Microbial Biomass and Microarthropod Community Responses to Conventional and Biodegradable Plastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers assessed the medium-term effects of conventional polyethylene plastic mulch versus biodegradable alternatives on soil microbial biomass and microarthropod communities. They found that both plastic types and their residues in soil influenced biological communities over time, though the specific impacts differed between conventional and biodegradable materials. The study provides evidence that switching to bioplastic mulches may alter, but not necessarily eliminate, the effects of plastic residues on soil ecosystems.
Long-term effects of conventional and biodegradable microplastics from mulch on freshwater communities
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers examined the long-term effects of both conventional and biodegradable mulch film microplastics on freshwater zooplankton populations after leaching from agricultural soils. Even environmentally relevant concentrations of mulch-derived microplastics reduced zooplankton reproduction, with biodegradable mulch microplastics showing effects comparable to conventional plastics.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.