0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Global daily mask use estimation in the pandemic and its post environmental health risks: Analysis based on a validated dynamic mathematical model

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2024 9 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Kmy Leung Ying Zhang, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Zhipeng He, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Fei Jiang, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Fengmin Li, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Kmy Leung Fengmin Li, Fengmin Li, Fengmin Li, Fengmin Li, Kmy Leung Kmy Leung Kmy Leung Fengmin Li, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Lu ShaoYong, Fengmin Li, Fengmin Li, Xiaoli Zhao, Fengmin Li, Xiaoli Zhao, Fengchang Wu, Xiaoli Zhao, Zi-hao Liu, Kmy Leung Fengchang Wu, Fengmin Li, Fengmin Li, Fengchang Wu, Kmy Leung Fengchang Wu, Kmy Leung Yuwen Wang, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Fengmin Li, Fengmin Li, Fengmin Li, Xiaoli Zhao, Kmy Leung Fengmin Li, Xiaoli Zhao, Fengchang Wu, Fengmin Li, Fengchang Wu, Xiaoli Zhao, Fengchang Wu, Xiaoli Zhao, Fengchang Wu, Xiaoli Zhao, Xiaoli Zhao, Fengchang Wu, Yiming Chi, Fengchang Wu, Fengchang Wu, Yiming Chi, Kmy Leung Kmy Leung Kmy Leung Kmy Leung Fengmin Li, Qingfeng Chen, Fengmin Li, Ling Zhang, Kmy Leung Kmy Leung Fengmin Li, Fengmin Li, Chenchen Jiang, Chenchen Jiang, Xiaoli Zhao, Fengchang Wu, Kmy Leung Fengchang Wu, Fengchang Wu, Fengchang Wu, Fengchang Wu, Xiaoli Zhao, Kmy Leung Kmy Leung Ling Zhang, Ling Zhang, Fengmin Li, Fengmin Li, Fengmin Li, Fengmin Li, Fengmin Li, Fengmin Li, Fengchang Wu, Fengchang Wu, Qingfeng Chen, Fengmin Li, Fengmin Li, Zhipeng He, Kmy Leung Kmy Leung Fengchang Wu, Xiaoli Zhao, Fengchang Wu, Zhipeng He, Xiaoli Zhao, Jianmin Qiao, Jianmin Qiao, Kmy Leung Xiaoya Xu, Kmy Leung Xiaohui Liu, Fengchang Wu, Fengchang Wu, Kmy Leung

Summary

Researchers developed a mathematical model to estimate daily disposable mask usage across 214 countries during the COVID-19 pandemic and projected how discarded masks contribute to microplastic pollution. The model estimated billions of masks were used daily at peak periods, releasing massive quantities of microplastic fibers as they degrade. The study provides a tool for policymakers to assess the long-term environmental health risks of pandemic-related plastic waste.

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic led to a sharp increase in disposable surgical mask usage. Discarded masks can release microplastic and cause environmental pollution. Since masks have become a daily necessity for protection against virus infections, it is necessary to review the usage and disposal of masks during the pandemic for future management. In this study, we constructed a dynamic model by introducing related parameters to estimate daily mask usage in 214 countries from January 22, 2020 to July 31, 2022. And we validated the accuracy of our model by establishing a dataset based on published survey data. Our results show that the cumulative mask usage has reached 800 billion worldwide, and the microplastics released from discarded masks due to mismanagement account for 3.27% of global marine microplastic emissions in this period. Furthermore, we illustrated the response relationship between mask usage and the infection rates. We found a marginally significant negative correlation existing between the mean daily per capita mask usage and the rate of cumulative confirmed cases within the range of 25% to 50%. This indicates that if the rate reaches the specified threshold, the preventive effect of masks may become evident.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper