0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Food & Water Sign in to save

Smartphone microscopic method for imaging and quantification of microplastics in drinking water

Microscopy Research and Technique 2024 11 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Asmita Karki, Asmita Karki, Baburam Kandel, Baburam Kandel, Bishan Man Thaiba, Bishan Man Thaiba, Thakur Sedai, Thakur Sedai, Bishan Man Thaiba, Bishan Man Thaiba, Bishan Man Thaiba, Bhanu Bhakta Neupane Bishan Man Thaiba, Bishan Man Thaiba, K. Acharya, Bishan Man Thaiba, Asmita Karki, Asmita Karki, Thakur Sedai, Bhanu Bhakta Neupane Asmita Karki, Thakur Sedai, Asmita Karki, Bhanu Bhakta Neupane Basant Giri, Basant Giri, Baburam Kandel, Basant Giri, Baburam Kandel, Hari Paudyal, Khaga Raj Sharma, Khaga Raj Sharma, Hari Paudyal, Khaga Raj Sharma, Khaga Raj Sharma, Basant Giri, Basant Giri, Basant Giri, Basant Giri, Basant Giri, Baburam Kandel, Basant Giri, Bhanu Bhakta Neupane Bhanu Bhakta Neupane Baburam Kandel, Bhanu Bhakta Neupane Basant Giri, Bhanu Bhakta Neupane Bhanu Bhakta Neupane Bhanu Bhakta Neupane

Summary

Researchers developed a low-cost smartphone microscope system capable of imaging and quantifying microplastic particles as small as 20 micrometers in drinking water. The setup uses a small sapphire ball lens attached to a smartphone camera combined with a density-based pre-concentration step. The study offers an accessible and affordable alternative to expensive laboratory instruments for monitoring microplastic contamination in drinking water.

Study Type Environmental

Analysis of microplastics in drinking water is often challenging due to smaller particle size and low particle count. In this study, we used a low cost and an easy to assemble smartphone microscopic system for imaging and quantitating microplastic particles as small as 20 μm. The system consisted of a spherical sapphire ball lens of 4 mm diameter attached to a smartphone camera as a major imaging component. It also involved pre-concentration of the sample using ZnCl<sub>2</sub> solution. The spike recovery and limit of detection of the method in filtered distilled and deionized water samples (n = 9) were 55.6% ± 9.7% and 34 particles/L, respectively. Imaging performance of the microscopic system was similar to a commercial bright field microscopic system. The method was further implemented to examine microplastic particles in commercial bottled and jar water samples (n = 20). The particles count in bottled and jar water samples ranged from 0-91 particles/L to 0-130 particles/L, respectively. In both sample types, particles of diverse shape and size were observed. The particles collected from water samples were further confirmed by FTIR spectra (n = 36), which found 97% of the particles tested were made of plastic material. These findings suggested that the smartphone microscopic system can be implemented as a low-cost alternative for preliminary screening of microplastic in drinking water samples. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: Ball lens based smartphone microscopic method was used for microplastic analysis. Particles of diverse shape and size were found in bottle and jar water samples.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper