0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Microplastics in wastewater and sludge from centralized and decentralized wastewater treatment plants: Effects of treatment systems and microplastic characteristics

Chemosphere 2024 35 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Me Me Maw, Me Me Maw, Suwanna Kitpati Boontanon, Suwanna Kitpati Boontanon, Suwanna Kitpati Boontanon, Chettiyappan Visvanathan, Chettiyappan Visvanathan, Narin Boontanon, Narin Boontanon, Narin Boontanon, Narin Boontanon, Humm Kham Zan Zan Aung, Narin Boontanon, Humm Kham Zan Zan Aung, Chettiyappan Visvanathan, Shigeo Fujii Shigeo Fujii, Ranjna Jindal, Shigeo Fujii, Shigeo Fujii, Shigeo Fujii Shigeo Fujii Suwanna Kitpati Boontanon, Shigeo Fujii Shigeo Fujii, Shigeo Fujii, Shigeo Fujii, Shigeo Fujii, Shigeo Fujii, Shigeo Fujii, Suwanna Kitpati Boontanon, Shigeo Fujii Shigeo Fujii Shigeo Fujii Shigeo Fujii Shigeo Fujii Shigeo Fujii Chettiyappan Visvanathan, Shigeo Fujii, Suwanna Kitpati Boontanon, Shigeo Fujii Shigeo Fujii, Chettiyappan Visvanathan, Shigeo Fujii, Shigeo Fujii

Summary

Researchers compared microplastic removal at centralized and decentralized wastewater treatment plants in Bangkok, Thailand. They found that centralized plants removed 50-97% of microplastics while smaller decentralized plants removed only 14-54%, with both types concentrating significant amounts of microplastics in their sludge, up to 228,100 particles per kilogram of dry weight.

Study Type Environmental

Domestic wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) play a vital role in limiting the release of microplastics (MP) into the environment. This study examined MP removal efficiency from five centralized and four decentralized domestic WWTPs in Bangkok, Thailand. MP concentrations in wastewater and sludge were comparable between centralized and decentralized WWTPs, despite these decentralized WWTPs serving smaller populations and having limited treatment capacity. The elimination of MPs ranged from 50 to 96.8% in centralized WWTPs and 14.2-53.6% in decentralized WWTPs. It is noted that the retained MPs concentrations in sludge ranged from 20,000 to 228,100 MP/kg dry weight. The prevalence of synthetic fibers and fragments could be attributed to their pathways from laundry or car tires, and the accidental release of a variety of plastic wastes ended up in investigated domestic WWTPs. Removal of MPs between the centralized and decentralized WWTPs was influenced by several impact factors including initial MP concentrations, longer retention times, MP fragmentation, and variations of MP concentrations in sludge leading to different activated sludge process configurations. Sewage sludge has become a primary location for the accumulation of incoming microplastics in WWTPs. The MPs entering and leaving each unit process were varied due to the unique characteristics of MPs, and their different treatment efficiencies. While the extended hydraulic retention period in decentralized WWTPs decreased the MP removal efficacy, the centralized WWTP with the two-stage activated sludge process achieved the highest MP removal efficiency.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper