0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Performance of bioretention systems by umbrella plant (Cyperus alternifolius L.) and common reed (Phragmites australis) for removal of microplastics

Environmental Technology & Innovation 2024 14 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers evaluated bioretention systems using umbrella plant and common reed as tertiary wastewater treatment for removing microplastics. They found that the plant root systems and substrate materials influenced microplastic retention, with the systems showing promise for reducing microplastic discharge into waterways. The study suggests that nature-based bioretention systems could serve as a practical supplementary treatment stage at wastewater facilities not originally designed to capture microplastics.

Study Type Environmental

Domestic wastewater is one of the main sources of microplastic (MP) contamination in aquatic environment; however, most wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have not been designed for the removal of MPs. In this study, the release rate of MPs in the treated water from a WWTP into the river was estimated to be approximately 105 × 103 pcs/capita/day. Thus, bioretention systems are designed as tertiary wastewater treatment systems to reduce the number of MPs in water resources. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of bioretention systems using the umbrella plant (Cyperus alternifolius L.) and common reed (Phragmites australis) for MP removal. After 17 weeks, MPs were found in the common reed bioretention system. The common reed root system and substrate influence the MP retention process to a greater extent through physical filtration, substrate ratio, plant roots, and biofilms on the roots. Additionally, the common reed root system played an important role in the removal of low-density MPs. The accumulation of MPs in roots and root hairs inevitably impacts plants. The results showed that the common reed at a 3:2:9 ratio (gravel: sand: soil) had the highest relative height growth rate (RHGR) (1.8 mm cm−1 week−1). These results show that the HSFs–3 at a ratio of 3:2:9 was able to reduce the number of MPs, with an average removal efficiency of 62.89 % and 95.45 % for sizes >1000 µm, 89.21 % for sizes 500–1000 µm, and 44.16 % for sizes <500 µm. The highest average microbeads removal efficiency was 95.24 %. Our results suggest that plant bioretention using Horizontal Subsurface Flow system is an effective treatment for removing MPs from wastewater.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastics profile in constructed wetlands: Distribution, retention and implications

AI summary Read the abstract

This study assessed microplastic distribution, retention, and implications within constructed wetlands used for wastewater treatment, finding that wetlands trap substantial quantities of MPs but that retention efficiency varies by plant species and wetland design. The results suggest constructed wetlands both remove and potentially accumulate MPs as a secondary pollution source.

Article Tier 2

Understanding microplastic retention in surface flow constructed wetlands: The impact of aquatic macrophytes

AI summary Read the abstract

This study tested how well constructed wetlands with different aquatic plants retain three common types of microplastics: polyethylene beads, tire wear particles, and synthetic fibers. Plants with complex leaf structures trapped more microplastics than simpler plants or unvegetated areas. The findings suggest that planted wetlands could serve as a nature-based solution for filtering microplastics from water before they reach rivers and drinking water sources.

Article Tier 2

Plant Based Application for Microplastic Removal in Constructed Wetlands: A Mini Review

AI summary Read the abstract

This mini-review examines how wetland plants in constructed wetlands capture and degrade microplastics through physical entrapment, root-zone interactions, and microbial activity, assessing operational factors that determine removal efficiency.

Article Tier 2

Retention of microplastics by interspersed lagoons in both natural and constructed wetlands

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers used laboratory wetland models to test how well constructed wetlands with interspersed lagoons and aquatic vegetation can capture microplastic particles from water. Combining vegetated patches with a lagoon achieved microplastic retention rates of up to 99%, suggesting that nature-based wetland designs could be an effective low-cost strategy for filtering microplastics out of wastewater and rivers before they reach the ocean.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics retention by reeds in freshwater environment

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers sampled microplastics in sediment and plant tissue from reed beds in a freshwater environment, finding that reeds retained significantly more microplastics than adjacent open water sediments, suggesting that emergent vegetation may act as a natural microplastic sink.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper