0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Risk perception of differet environmental concerns

Open Science Framework 2024 Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Nina Vaupotič, Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl, Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Nina Vaupotič, Sabine Pahl Nina Vaupotič, Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl Sabine Pahl

Summary

This study investigated how individuals perceive and prioritize different environmental risks including microplastics, air pollution, and climate change, using survey data to compare risk perception across demographic groups. The findings reveal that awareness of microplastic risks lags behind other environmental concerns.

We run a public perception survey in the frame of the project titled “Source to Seas - Zero Pollution 2030 (SOS-ZEROPOL2030)” to investigate individuals risk perception (concern for health and environment as well as mitigation urgency) related to four different environmental issues (microplastics, PFAS, eutrophication and underwater noise). In addition, we assessed other psycho-social variables: values, personal norms, beliefs about causes of pollution, trust in governments and industry, techno-optimism, systems thinking, and socio-demographics including SES, subjective financial scarcity and political affiliation. Other variables that were assessed but will not be considered in this study are pro-environmental policy support and behavioral intention. The survey was administered in Belgium, Bulgaria, Ireland, Greece and the Netherlands. The samples in each country were standardized for gender, age, and region (total N = 4886, approximately equally distributed across the five countries).

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper