0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Prediction of Settling Velocity of Microplastics by Multiple Machine-Learning Methods

Water 2024 9 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Lu Cao, Zequan Leng, Zequan Leng, Di Wu Di Wu Lu Cao, Di Wu Yun Gao, Lu Cao, Di Wu Lu Cao, Lu Cao, Lu Cao, Lu Cao, Lu Cao, Lu Cao, Lu Cao, Lu Cao, Lu Cao, Di Wu Di Wu Di Wu Yun Gao, Di Wu Di Wu Yun Gao, Di Wu Di Wu Zhongyan Huo, Di Wu Di Wu Yadong Hou, Yadong Hou, Di Wu Di Wu Yun Gao, Di Wu Di Wu Di Wu Di Wu Zhongyan Huo, Zhongyan Huo, Di Wu Di Wu Di Wu Zhongyan Huo, Zhongyan Huo, Zhongyan Huo, Xizeng Zhao, Xizeng Zhao, Xizeng Zhao, Xizeng Zhao, Zhongyan Huo, Yun Gao, Xizeng Zhao, Yun Gao, Di Wu

Summary

Researchers developed machine learning models to predict the settling velocity of microplastics in water, using particle shape, size, and density as inputs. The models outperformed traditional empirical equations, providing a more accurate tool for modeling microplastic transport and sedimentation.

Body Systems
Study Type Environmental

The terminal settling velocity of microplastics plays a vital role in the physical behavior of microplastics, and is related to the migration and fate of these microplastics in the ocean. At present, the terminal settling velocity is mostly calculated by formulae, which also leads to a fewer studies on the use of machine-learning models to predict its settling velocity in this field. This study fills this gap by studying the prediction of the settling velocity by machine-learning models and compares it with the traditional formula calculation method. This study evaluates three machine-learning models, namely, random forest, linear regression, and the back propagation neural network. The results of this study show that the prediction results of the three machine-learning models are more accurate than those of traditional formula calculations, with an accuracy increase of 12.79% (random forest), 9.3% (linear regression), and 13.92% (back propagation neural network), respectively. At the same time, according to the results of this study, random forest is better than the other models in the mean absolute error and root mean square error evaluation indicators, which are only 0.0036 and 0.0047. This paper proposes three machine-learning methods to prove that the prediction effect of machine learning is much better than traditional formula calculations, thereby improving the shortcomings in this field. At the same time, it also provides reliable data support for studying the migration behavior of microplastics in water bodies.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper