We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
O-174 Marginal gains: can small actions in the ART lab improve the environmental impact of medically assisted reproduction?
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers assessed whether small, incremental changes in ART laboratory practices could collectively reduce the environmental impact of medically assisted reproduction without compromising safety or treatment outcomes. The study found that cumulative marginal gains across labs can meaningfully reduce resource use and emissions.
Abstract Marginal gains can small actions in the ART laboratory improve the environmental impact of medically assisted reproduction? (Invitation) Study question Is it possible to reduce the environmental impact of assisted reproductive technology (ART) laboratories while maintaining quality and safety? Summary answer While individual interventions may yield modest results, their cumulative effect on a wider scale can lead to substantial reductions in resource consumption and emissions over time without compromising treatment outcomes or patient/staff safety. What is known already According to the World Health Organisation (WHO) the change in global climate is one of the gravest threats facing humanity, with pregnant women, new-born and child health considered highly vulnerable. In recent years growing evidence has linked climate change, air pollution, pollutant exposure and microplastics to compromised male and female reproductive health and even spontaneous and in vitro fertilisation (IVF) outcomes. Ironically, the healthcare industry is a major contributor of greenhouse gas emissions, and the rapidly increasing utilisation of ART has raised concerns regarding its environmental footprint. A field primarily driven by highly specialised, energy-intensive laboratory processes, continuous monitoring of hormone testing, single-use consumables and large amounts of waste; the quest for bringing awareness to sustainable practices within ART laboratories is critical, not just for the planet, but for our patients and future generations. Study design, size, duration Alongside a comprehensive review of existing literature, a panel of international professionals and enthusiasts within reproductive medicine, law and environmental science convened in a green conferencing format to discuss key environmental challenges associated with ART and explored potential avenues for enhancing sustainability in the laboratory. A survey and interviews with stakeholders also took place to understand current attitudes and provide real-time social, economic and environmental examples of sustainability in ART laboratories. Main Results I will present a roadmap for sustainability in the IVF laboratory so far. A selection of actions which result in marginal gains within the ART laboratory include but are not limited to: Participate in a ‘green certification’ programme specifically tailored to the IVF laboratory and consider forming a ‘green team’ Aim for energy efficiency, renewable energy, preventive maintenance and consider plug load of non-essential equipment for cost savings. Consider widening operating ranges for temperature and humidity, air circulation changes and HVAC design where possible for energy savings of 15–30% Correct waste management can result in > 30% reduction in clinical waste alongside €11,600 annual savings, with focus on prevention of unnecessary consumables (dishes, media), reducing use of plastics and other single-use items to the extent that is possible and safe, and reusing where appropriate (e.g., training vitrification straws). Adopt electronic platforms for consents/laboratory paperwork; avoiding the use of > 40 pages per cycle in the UK. Reuse packaging materials (cold gel packs, bubble wrap) or form partnerships with local businesses who can reuse. Manage inventory carefully, asking for products with longer expiry dates, and consolidate purchase order to minimise frequency. Minimise liquid nitrogen loss during routine activities and consider batching samples for cryo-transport to minimise frequency of shipments. Limitations Every country, region and laboratory is different and will have their own myriad of regulatory constraints and industry standards to adhere to. This may present barriers to the adoption of certain sustainability measures in ART laboratories and is therefore imperative to seek local guidance first. Wider implications of the findings The carbon footprint of ART extends beyond the laboratory and into the supply chain, encompassing transportation, pharmaceutical production, and waste disposal processes. In this way a holistic approach is necessary, with the need for partnerships between fertility clinics, manufacturers, and regulatory bodies continuously working together to drive the development and adoption of sustainable practices and technologies across the entire ART field.
More Papers Like This
Rethinking The Surgical Field: The Impact Of OR Draping Practices On Waste And Carbon Emissions
AI summary Read the abstract
Surgeons found that using fewer disposable gowns and drapes for minor skin surgeries cut medical waste by over 3 kg per procedure, cut costs by thousands of dollars, and didn't increase infection risk. This matters because those disposable materials are made from non-biodegradable plastic that's carbon-intensive to produce, so simple changes to surgical routines could meaningfully shrink hospitals' environmental footprint without compromising patient safety.
Rethinking The Surgical Field: The Impact Of OR Draping Practices On Waste And Carbon Emissions
AI summary Read the abstract
For minor skin surgeries on kids, doctors found that using less disposable gowning and draping (instead of the usual full setup) cut surgical waste by over 3 kg per case, saved money, and didn't increase infection risk at all. This matters because those plastic drapes are made from non-biodegradable materials that take a heavy environmental toll to produce, so simple changes in the operating room could meaningfully cut hospital pollution and costs without compromising patient safety.
Reducing environmental impacts of marine biotoxin monitoring: A laboratory report
AI summary Read the abstract
A laboratory in Ireland measured the environmental footprint of routine marine biotoxin monitoring required for shellfish safety, documenting energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, and chemical waste generation associated with regulatory testing programs. The authors identify opportunities to reduce the environmental impact of monitoring laboratories through method optimization and green chemistry practices.
Resource Stewardship in Pediatric Endotracheal Aspirates: Modeled Financial, Environmental, and Laboratory Time Savings from a Gram Stain-Guided Stop Strategy
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found that many lung fluid tests ordered for sick kids show no bacteria under a simple microscope check (Gram stain), yet labs often still run the full culture test anyway, wasting time, money, and plastic supplies. By stopping the process early when the initial check shows nothing, hospitals could save over $270,000 in charges, hundreds of staff hours, and reduce medical waste, all without changing patient care quality. This matters because cutting unnecessary lab work doesn't just save money, it also means less single-use plastic waste and pollution from incineration, benefiting both healthcare budgets and the environment.
Small Changes, Big Impact: Nudging Employees Toward Sustainable Behaviors
AI summary Read the abstract
Despite its classification in this database, this study tested social norm nudges to promote sustainable workplace behaviors at plasma donation centers — not microplastic research. The interventions achieved a 70% reduction in plastic waste from dropped collection materials and an 80% decrease in freezer door alarm frequency, with effects persisting over time.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.