0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/article.php?id=4400

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science 2026 Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
J. A. Razak, Shamsul Bahari Azraai, Nasri Semiun, Thinakaran Narayanan

Summary

This review examines how circularity in plastics is being advanced through product redesign, advanced recycling technologies, and policy instruments like Extended Producer Responsibility. Researchers found that the transition to a circular plastic economy is constrained by infrastructure deficits, uneven public awareness, and fragmented regional strategies. The study argues that effective circularity requires not only technical innovation but also attention to the social and economic dimensions of plastic waste management.

Plastic waste has become one of the defining sustainability challenges of our time, demanding a decisive shift from the linear “take–make–dispose” model toward a circular plastic economy. This brief review paper examines how circularity in plastics is being advanced through innovative approaches such as product redesign, advanced recycling technologies, and policy instruments, including Circular Economy Blueprints and Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR). Yet, the transition is constrained by systemic barriers: deficits in infrastructure, uneven public awareness, weak enforcement, and fragmented regional strategies. Beyond technical interventions, the circular economy of plastics requires a social perspective that acknowledges the environmental, economic, and societal costs of mismanaged waste. Failures in recycling systems intensify hidden risks, notably microplastic pollution and human health impacts, underscoring the urgency of comprehensive reform. Pathways to overcoming these barriers include strategic regional collaboration, scientific innovation, and inclusive governance frameworks that integrate social responsibility with technological progress. By situating these dynamics within broader debates on sustainable development, this paper offers insights into practical strategies for embedding circularity in plastic recycling and advancing resilience across diverse contexts.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

The Frontier of Plastics Recycling: Rethinking Waste as a Resource for High‐Value Applications

This review examines the current state and future prospects of plastics recycling within a circular economy framework, arguing that mechanical recycling alone is insufficient and that chemical recycling, design-for-recyclability, and extended producer responsibility must all be scaled simultaneously. The authors identify high-value applications for recycled plastics as essential incentives for building economically sustainable recycling systems.

Article Tier 2

Accelerating Plastic Circularity: A Critical Assessment of the Pathways and Processes to Circular Plastics

A critical assessment of plastic circularity pathways found that today only 9% of global plastic waste is recycled, with current circularity routes economically unviable, and argues that improving product design and collection and sorting system effectiveness are the most impactful levers for progress.

Article Tier 2

An Integrated Analysis of Plastic Packaging Value Chain: Identifying Barriers and Enablers for a Circular Economy

Researchers analyzed the full plastic packaging value chain to identify barriers and enablers for transitioning to a circular economy, tracing the evolution of circular economy concepts and quantifying the environmental impacts associated with exponential plastic waste growth. The study provides an integrated framework mapping opportunities for intervention across production, use, collection, and recycling stages.

Article Tier 2

Are Reliable and Emerging Technologies Available for Plastic Recycling in a Circular Economy?

This review examines the current landscape of plastic recycling technologies -- including mechanical, thermal, chemical, and biological depolymerization methods such as pyrolysis -- evaluating their readiness for circular economy integration. It concludes that while recycling rates remain below 10% globally, emerging technologies offer pathways toward closed-loop plastic supply chains, though full-scale implementation requires further development and performance assessment.

Article Tier 2

Concretising the role of extended producer responsibility in European Union waste law and policy through the lens of the circular economy

This review examines the evolution of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) within European Union waste law and policy, analyzing how EPR instruments can be strengthened to drive more effective plastic waste prevention and recycling across the product lifecycle. The authors argue for more ambitious, harmonized EPR frameworks to reduce plastic pollution at its source.

Share this paper