0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Global change factors differ in effect when acting alone and in a multi-factor background

Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) 2026 Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Anika Lehmann, Matthias C. Rillig Anika Lehmann, Rebecca Rongstock, Rebecca Rongstock, Rebecca Rongstock, Rebecca Rongstock, Rebecca Rongstock, Rebecca Rongstock, Huiying Li, Huiying Li, Huiying Li, Matthias C. Rillig Anika Lehmann, Anika Lehmann, Anika Lehmann, Rebecca Rongstock, Matthias C. Rillig Anika Lehmann, Anja Wulf, Matthias C. Rillig Anja Wulf, Anja Wulf, Matthias C. Rillig Rebecca Rongstock, Anja Wulf, Matthias C. Rillig, Matthias C. Rillig Anika Lehmann, Anja Wulf, Anja Wulf, Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Anja Wulf, Anja Wulf, Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig Matthias C. Rillig

Summary

An urban soil experiment using a subtractive design (removing individual stressors from a multi-stressor scenario including microplastics, heat, road salt, drought, nitrogen, and surfactants) found that combined stressors produce very different — often worse — effects than any single stressor causes alone. For microplastic research, the key implication is that lab studies testing microplastics in isolation likely underestimate real-world harms, because in urban soils microplastics always co-occur with multiple other stressors.

The presence of multiple global change factors affects most ecosystems. Urban soils face stressors like heat, drought, road salt, nitrogen deposition, surfactants, and microplastics. Given that combined factors of global change have shown unpredictable effects, we here ask which individual factors have particularly negative effects in multifactorial contexts. We explore this through a subtractive design, comparing single-factor treatments (addition) to treatments where a specific factor is removed (subtraction). The results vary from predominantly negative, positive, to mixed effects. However, removing these factors from a multi-factor context generally improves soil properties and biological processes. Resource related factors enhance microbial activity individually but show no such benefit in multi-factor scenarios. Our findings highlight that the combined effects of factors often differ from their individual impacts. In restoration, priority should be given to mitigating factors with the strongest negative influence in multi-stressor contexts, rather than targeting those with significant isolated effects.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper