0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Food & Water Sign in to save

Environmental impacts of food packaging: Is it all a matter of raw materials?

Sustainable Production and Consumption 2024 25 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Francesco Arfelli, Marlena Roguszewska, Gianluca Torta, Matteo Iurlo, Daniele Cespi, Luca Ciacci, Fabrizio Passarini

Summary

Researchers conducted a full life cycle environmental assessment of polypropylene-based versus paper-based chocolate bar packaging, finding that paper packaging performs better in 10 to 16 out of 18 environmental impact categories. The study shows that processing steps, not just raw materials, play a major role in a package's overall environmental footprint.

Polymers

The packaging sector and the environmental impacts stemming from its various materials and applications are currently at the forefront of scientific and political debate. To estimate the environmental impacts associated with raw materials and identify the role of industrial processes, this study presents a cradle-to-grave Life Cycle Assessment applied to two distinct packaging formulations for chocolate bars, namely oriented polypropylene-based and paper-based packaging. The product systems related to the two alternatives were compared by focusing on the contribution of each resource input and emission of the production phase, to identify respective environmental trade-offs and potentials for future improvements throughout the life cycle. Our study also proposes a laboratory-based approach to develop robust assumptions concerning the modeling of end-of-life material treatment and provide support to decision-making toward environmentally sustainable waste management practices. From the outcomes, a relative preference emerges for paper-based packaging, from a minimum of 10 to a maximum of 16 out of 18 environmental categories, depending on the evaluated scenario. The hotspot analysis highlighted a significant influence of the processing phases, with raw materials being generally characterized by lower percentage contributions to the final impact. In conclusion, the findings underscore the importance of considering the entire life cycle when assessing packaging sustainability. Moreover, the proposed laboratory approach offers valuable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders to optimize end-of-life strategies and minimize the overall environmental footprint of packaging materials.

Share this paper