0
Systematic Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Sign in to save

A Systematic Review and Characterization of the Major and Most Studied Urban Soil Threats in the European Union

Water Air & Soil Pollution 2024 4 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Calogero Schillaci Hongdou Liu, Hannah Binner, Arwyn Jones, Edita Baltrėnaitė, Felipe Yunta, Felipe Yunta, Piotr Wojda, Piotr Wojda, Remigio Paradelo, Vesna Zupanc, Mauro De Feudis, Felipe Yunta, Felipe Yunta, Timo Breure, Calogero Schillaci Hongdou Liu, Andrea Schievano, Emanuele Massaro, Arwyn Jones, Hongdou Liu, Jennifer Newell, Jennifer Newell, Remigio Paradelo, Arwyn Jones, Iustina Popescu, Piotr Wojda, Edita Baltrėnaitė, Piotr Wojda, Teresa Tuttolomondo, Nicolò Iacuzzi, Giulia Bondi, Vesna Zupanc, Laure Mamy, Lorenza Pacini, Mauro De Feudis, Valeria Cardelli, Alicja Kicińska, Michael J. Stock, Hongdou Liu, Erdona Demiraj, Calogero Schillaci

Summary

Researchers systematically reviewed research on urban soil pollution across Europe, comparing two literature analysis methods, and found that heavy metals and soil organic carbon loss are the two biggest threats to city soils. The study highlights major evidence gaps that need to be filled to support the EU's Zero Pollution Action Plan.

Abstract There is an urgent need by the European Union to establish baseline levels for many widespread pollutants and to set out specific levels for these under the Zero pollution action plan. To date, few systematic reviews, superseded by bibliometric analyses, have explored this issue. Even less research has been carried out to compare the efficacy of these two data extraction approaches. This study aims to address these two issues by i) constructing an inventory of the available information on urban soils, highlighting evidence gaps and measuring compliance with the Zero pollution action plan, and by ii) comparing the methods and results of these two data extraction approaches. Through Scopus and Web of Science databases, peer-reviewed articles using the terms urban soil in combination with specific urban soil threats and/or challenges were included. Notably, both approaches retrieved a similar number of initial articles overall, while the bibliometric analysis removed fewer duplicates and excluded fewer articles overall, leaving the total number of articles included in each approach as: 603 articles in the systematic review and 2372 articles in the bibliometric analysis. Nevertheless, both approaches identified the two main urban soil threats and/or challenges to be linked to soil organic carbon and/or heavy metals. This study gives timely input into the Zero pollution action plan and makes recommendations to stakeholders within the urban context.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper