0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Is it time to revise the fighting strategy toward type 2 diabetes? Sex and pollution as new risk factors

Ageing Research Reviews 2024 14 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Michelangela Barbieri, Francesco Prattichizzo, Rosalba La Grotta, Giulia Matacchione, Lucia Scisciola, Rosaria Anna Fontanella, Giovanni Tortorella, Rosaria Benedetti, Vincenzo Carafa, Raffaele Marfella, Antonio Ceriello, Giuseppe Paolisso

Summary

This review argues that environmental pollution, including exposure to microplastics and plastic chemicals like bisphenol A and phthalates, should be recognized as a risk factor for type 2 diabetes alongside traditional causes like diet and genetics. Lab studies show these pollutants can damage the pancreas, promote insulin resistance, and alter fat metabolism. The effects may differ between men and women, suggesting that both sex and pollution exposure should be considered in diabetes prevention strategies.

Study Type In vitro

Diabetes mellitus, a metabolic condition affecting around 537 million individuals worldwide, poses significant challenges, particularly among the elderly population. The etiopathogenesis of type 2 diabetes (T2D) depends on a combination of the effects driven by advancing age, genetic background, and lifestyle habits, e.g. overnutrition. These factors influence the development of T2D differently in men and women, with an obvious sexual dimorphism possibly underlying the diverse clinical features of the disease in different sexes. More recently, environmental pollution, estimated to cause 9 million deaths every year, is emerging as a novel risk factor for the development of T2D. Indeed, exposure to atmospheric pollutants such as PM2.5, O3, NO2, and Persistent Organic Pollutants (POP)s, along with their combination and bioaccumulation, is associated with the development of T2D and obesity, with a 15 % excess risk in case of exposure to very high levels of PM2.5. Similar data are available for plasticizer molecules, e.g. bisphenol A and phthalates, emerging endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Even though causality is still debated at this stage, preclinical evidence sustains the ability of multiple pollutants to affect pancreatic function, promote insulin resistance, and alter lipid metabolism, possibly contributing to T2D onset and progression. In addition, preclinical findings suggest a possible role also for plastic itself in the development of T2D. Indeed, pioneeristic studies evidenced that micro- or nanoplastics (MNP)s, particles in the micro- or nano- range, promote cellular damage, senescence, inflammation, and metabolic disturbances, leading to insulin resistance and impaired glucose metabolism in animal and/or in vitro models. Here we synthesize recent knowledge relative to the association between air-related or plastic-derived pollutants and the incidence of T2D, discussing also the possible mechanistic links suggested by the available literature. We then anticipate the need for future studies in the field of candidate therapeutic strategies limiting pollution-induced damage in preclinical models, such as SGLT-2 inhibitors. We finally postulate that future guidelines for T2D prevention should consider pollution and sex an additional risk factors to limit the diabetes pandemic.

Share this paper