We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastic pollution in the North-east Atlantic Ocean surface water: How the sampling approach influences the extent of the issue
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared two different sampling methods for measuring microplastic pollution in the open North-east Atlantic Ocean and found that results varied dramatically depending on the technique used. The grab sampling method captured significantly more small particles than the traditional Manta trawl approach. The study demonstrates that the choice of sampling method can fundamentally change our understanding of how much microplastic pollution exists in ocean waters.
A lack of standardization in monitoring protocols has hindered the accurate evaluation of microplastic (MP) pollution in the open sea and its potential impacts. As sampling techniques significantly influence the amounts of MPs contained in the sample, the aim of this study was to compare two sampling methods: Manta trawl (size selective approach) and grab sampling (volume selective approach). Both approaches were applied in the open sea surface waters of the North-east Atlantic Ocean. Onshore sample processing was carried out using the innovative tape lifting technique, which affords a series of advantages, including prevention of airborne contamination during analysis, without compromising integrity of the results. The results obtained indicated an MP concentration over four orders of magnitude higher using grab sampling compared to the Manta net approach (mean values equal to 0.24 and 4050 items/m, respectively). Consequently, the sole quantification of MPs using results obtained with the Manta trawl resulted in a marked underestimation of abundance. Nevertheless, the grab sampling technique is intricately linked to a risk of collecting non-representative water volumes, consequently leading to an overestimation of MPs abundance and a significant inter-sample variability. Moreover, the latter method is unsuitable for use in sampling larger MPs or in areas with low concentrations of MP pollution. The optimal sampling method therefore is dependent on the specific objectives of the study, often resulting in a combination of size and volume selective methods. The results of this study have the potential to contribute to the standardization of monitoring protocols for microplastics, both during the sampling phase and sample processing.
More Papers Like This
On the representativeness of pump water samples versus manta sampling in microplastic analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared pump sampling and manta net sampling methods for measuring microplastic concentrations in water and found that the two methods produced different results, highlighting how sampling technique choice significantly affects the representativeness and comparability of microplastic pollution data.
Are we underestimating floating microplastic pollution? A quantitative analysis of two sampling methodologies
AI summary Read the abstract
A quantitative analysis of 67 microplastic studies compared bulk water sampling with trawl-based methods, finding substantial differences in reported concentrations depending on the technique used. The study warns that inconsistent sampling methodology leads to underestimates of microplastic pollution and hinders cross-study comparisons.
A comparison of sampling methods for seawater microplastics and a first report of the microplastic litter in coastal waters of Ascension and Falkland Islands
AI summary Read the abstract
Microplastic concentrations measured by bottle grab sampling (filtered to 0.45 μm) were roughly 1,000-fold higher than estimates from net-based methods, demonstrating that commonly used plankton trawls dramatically underestimate microplastic abundance. The study also documents for the first time that microplastics are present in the waters around Ascension Island and the Falkland Islands, establishing contamination at remote South Atlantic locations.
Sea surface microplastics in the Galapagos: Grab samples reveal high concentrations of particles <200 μm in size
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared two microplastic sampling methods in the coastal waters of the Galapagos Islands and found dramatically different results depending on the technique used. Whole seawater grab samples filtered to 1.2 micrometers revealed microplastic concentrations four orders of magnitude higher than traditional plankton net tows with 200-micrometer mesh. The study suggests that standard ocean sampling methods may vastly underestimate the true abundance of small microplastics in marine environments.
Grab vs. neuston tow net: a microplastic sampling performance comparison and possible advances in the field
AI summary Read the abstract
This study directly compared the performance of grab sampling (taking a small water volume by hand) versus neuston tow netting for quantifying surface microplastics, finding that results differed significantly. The comparison highlights how method choice affects reported concentrations, making inter-study comparisons unreliable without method standardization.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.