We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Treatment of greywater and presence of microplastics in on-site systems
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated microplastic occurrence in on-site wastewater treatment systems used for greywater, finding that these decentralized systems do not fully remove microplastics before discharge. The study highlights a poorly studied pathway for microplastics entering the environment.
Eight on-site greywater treatment facilities of four different types (A, B, C and D) were investigated. Three were commercially available package plants (A-C) and one was a conventional sand filter (D). The treatment unit of Type A consisted of a geotextile-fitted trickling filter and a sand filter bottom layer, the Type B consisted of packs of fibrous mineral wool filter materials, and the Type C consisted of a fine-meshed plastic filter. The treatment systems were assessed in terms of their removal efficiency for organic matter (e.g. BOD, COD, TOC), nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus), surfactants, indicator bacteria (E. coli and enterococci) as well as microplastics. Systems A and D effectively reduced organic matter by >96% BOD, >94% COD and >90% TOC. Their effluent BOD was <29 mg/l. The BOD reduction in the treatment facilities of types B and C was in the range of 70-95%. Removal of anionic surfactants was >90% with effluent concentration <1 mg/l in all facilities. In general, the treatment systems were ineffective in removing E. coli and enterococci; the most efficient was the sand filter (type D), achieving 1.4-3.8 log10 for E. coli and 2.3-3.3 log10 for enterococci. Due to the high E. coli in the effluents, all the on-site systems were classified as Poor (score: 0-44) according to the water quality index (WQI) assessment. In two of the studied facilities, nine microplastic polymers were targeted (i.e. PVC, PS, PET, PE, PC, NG, PMMA, PP and PA6) and analyzed using the thermal extraction desorption gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (TED-GCMS) technique. PVC, PS, PET and PA6 were commonly detected in the influent and effluent. The effluent quality from type A and D systems was found to comply with the European Commission's guideline for the reuse of reclaimed water except for the indicator bacteria concentration.
More Papers Like This
Quantifying microplastics and their retention in greywater treatment systems of different scales
AI summary Read the abstract
Your household wastewater from sinks, showers, and laundry (called "greywater") contains tiny plastic particles that wash off clothes and other products—and this study found that certain filtration systems using materials like biochar, gravel, and wetland-style setups can trap over 99% of these microplastics before the water gets reused or released into the environment. This matters because as more communities recycle greywater to conserve water, having effective filtration means fewer microplastics end up back in our environment and water supply, where they could eventually make their way into what we drink and eat.
Microplásticos em água cinza
AI summary Read the abstract
This study examined microplastic contamination in greywater (household wastewater from washing), finding that laundry and personal care product use introduce significant quantities of microplastics into domestic wastewater streams. The research highlights greywater as an underexamined pathway of microplastic release into water systems.
Microplastics in greywater from households, a residential building, and an urban city district
AI summary Read the abstract
Every time you shower, do laundry, or wash dishes, the wastewater ("greywater") that goes down the drain carries tiny plastic particles called microplastics with it. This study measured how much of this plastic pollution comes from homes and city buildings, and tested whether filter systems designed to clean this water before it's reused or released into the environment can actually catch these particles. Understanding this matters because greywater is increasingly being recycled for things like irrigation, so knowing whether treatment systems can filter out microplastics helps determine if we're inadvertently spreading plastic pollution back into our water and food systems.
Microplastic contamination and removal efficiency in greywater treatment using a membrane bioreactor
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers evaluated a pilot-scale membrane bioreactor for removing microplastics from real household greywater and achieved removal rates of up to 90%. The dominant microplastic types found were polypropylene particles and polyester fibers, with most particles in the 101-300 micrometer size range. The study suggests that membrane bioreactor technology could be an effective tool for reducing microplastic discharge from buildings into the environment.
Microplastics in greywater from households, a residential building, and an urban city district
AI summary Read the abstract
Every time you shower, wash dishes, or do laundry, that "greywater" carries tiny plastic particles (microplastics) down the drain—and this study measured just how much shows up in wastewater from homes, apartment buildings, and city neighborhoods. The researchers also tested whether treatment systems like filters and "green walls" (plant-covered filtration structures) can catch these particles before the water is reused or released, which matters because unfiltered greywater is increasingly recycled for things like irrigation. While this study doesn't directly examine health effects, understanding how well these systems trap microplastics is an important step toward reducing our ever
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.