We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Small microplastics have much higher mass concentrations than large microplastics at the surface of nine major European rivers
Summary
Researchers compared large and small microplastic concentrations at the surface of nine major European rivers using standardized sampling protocols. The study found that small microplastics (25-500 micrometers) had much higher mass concentrations than large microplastics, with ratios up to 1,000 times greater in some rivers, suggesting that current monitoring focused on larger particles may significantly underestimate total microplastic pollution.
Understanding the fates and impacts of microplastics requires information on their sizes, polymer types, concentrations, and spatial and temporal distributions. Here, we focused on large (LMPs, 500 µm to 5 mm) and small (SMPs, 25 to 500 µm) microplastics sampled with the exact same protocol in nine of the major European rivers during the seven months of the Tara Microplastic Expedition. Attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) and pyrolysis coupled with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (Py-GC-MS) analyses were used to determine the microplastics contents by number and mass. The median LMP concentration was 6.7 particles m, which was lower than those in other regions of the world (America and Asia). The SMP mass concentration was much higher to the LMP concentrations, with SMP/LMP ratios up to 1000 in some rivers. We did not observe a systematic positive effect of urban areas for the two size classes or polymers; this could be explained by the fact that the transport of microplastic is highly heterogeneous in rivers. We believe that this study has important implications for predictive models of plastics distribution and fate in aquatic environments.