We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comparative Assessment of Physicochemical and Cytotoxic Characterisation, in Khaini and Filtered Khaini Smokeless Tobacco Products
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists tested two types of chewing tobacco sold in India - a newer "filtered" version called Cool Lip that's marketed as safer, and a traditional type called Hans. They found that Cool Lip actually contains similar or even higher levels of cancer-causing chemicals compared to the traditional product, despite being advertised as a healthier alternative. This means people switching to these "reduced-risk" tobacco products may not be protecting their health as much as they think.
Abstract Objectives Smokeless tobacco (SLT) products such as Cool Lip, marketed in India in filter-pouch form and resembling Swedish snus, are widely promoted as reduced-risk alternatives to traditional SLT such as Khaini(HANS). This study aims to systematically characterize the physicochemical, chemical, and biological toxicity profile of Cool Lip in comparison to a conventional SLT brand, Hans, to provide evidence on their health risks. Study Design Comprehensive analyses were performed to assess physical properties (pH, moisture, particle size using SEM imaging), chemical constituents (nicotine, TSNA, heavy metals, PAHs, alkalis, pesticides, and microplastic contamination), and microbiological load. Cytotoxicity was evaluated via MTT assay and apoptosis by AO staining in primary human gingival fibroblasts exposed to product extracts. Results Cool Lip exhibited a finer, more porous, and fragmented microstructure than Hans, which can accelerate chemical dissolution and absorption. Both products contained high levels of carcinogenic TSNAs and PAHs, and demonstrated higher concentrations of NNN, NNK, and nicotine, while Cool Lip had a substantially greater benzo[a]pyrene burden. Cytotoxicity and apoptosis were dose-dependent for both, with Hans consistently causing greater cellular toxicity. Conclusions Despite being marketed as a harm-reduced alternative, Cool Lip exhibits comparable or even greater toxicological risks relative to established Indian SLT products. The findings emphasize the urgent need for regulatory scrutiny and consumer education to counter misleading safety perceptions.
More Papers Like This
Microplastics contamination in branded cigarettes: Characterization and potential burning inhalation risk assessment
AI summary Read the abstract
Analysis of 21 domestic and international cigarette brands found microplastics present in filter materials, raising concern about inhalation exposure during smoking as an underrecognized route of human microplastic intake.
Nitrosamine and nicotine exposure after switching from filtered to unfiltered cigarette smoking: a cross-over clinical trial.
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers conducted a randomized cross-over trial in 29 smokers switching between filtered and unfiltered cigarettes and found no significant difference in urinary cotinine or NNAL nitrosamine biomarkers, suggesting that banning cellulose acetate filters—the most common plastic litter item—would reduce environmental microplastic pollution without meaningfully increasing health risk to smokers.
Hidden contaminants in e-liquids: Detection of microplastics and their potential human health risks
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers analyzed commercial e-cigarette vaping liquids for microplastics and found irregularly shaped particles, identifying potential human health risks from inhalation of microplastics present in these widely used consumer products.
Thermal conversion of waste cigarette butts: Feedstock heterogeneity, process control, valorization pathways, and environmental safety: A critical review.
AI summary Read the abstract
This review summarizes existing research on heating cigarette butts to break them down, since their plastic filters shed microplastic fibers and leach toxic chemicals. It describes how heating releases substances like acetic acid, phenols, and nicotine, forming oil, gas, or char, but notes that heating does not necessarily remove all toxic components and complete data on their distribution are still missing.
Microplastics from cigarette filters: Comparative effects on selected terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared the effects of microplastics from smoked and unsmoked cigarette filters on both land and water invertebrates. Smoked filter microplastics were more toxic due to the added chemicals from tobacco smoke, causing reduced survival and reproduction in the test organisms. Since cigarette butts are one of the most littered items worldwide, this study shows they are a significant and underappreciated source of toxic microplastic pollution in the environment.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.