0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Comparative analysis of microplastics detection methods applied to marine sediments: A case study in the Bay of Marseille

Marine Pollution Bulletin 2024 9 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Olivia Gérigny, Gustavo Blanco, Urmas Lips, Natalja Buhhalko, Leelou Chouteau, Elise Georges, Meyers, Nelle, Nelle Meyers, David Vanavermaete, François Galgani, Mélanie Ourgaud, Laure Papillon, Richard Sempéré, Bavo De Witte

Summary

This study compared multiple analytical methods for detecting and quantifying microplastics in marine sediment samples, evaluating extraction efficiency, polymer identification accuracy, and practical considerations for routine environmental monitoring.

Study Type Environmental

An intercomparison exercise on "microplastics in sediment" was carried out by five laboratories using samples collected in the Bay of Marseille in September 2021. The results from different extraction and identification methods varied depending on the type and size classes of MPs, and was better than 80 % for the size class >300 μm and for the fragments. The variability in recovery rates can be attributed to the choice of reagents and extraction protocols. Recovery rates per laboratory were between 47 % and 113 % and the use of ZnCl and NaI increased recovery rates by an average of 70 %. The lowest recovery rates (47 and 53 %) were attributed to the reference methods (FTIR and LDIR), conversely the highest (80 and 87 %) were attributed to identification by Nile Red. The average ranged between 23 and 53 items /50 g d.w. with decreases offshore and at greater depth.

Share this paper