We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
The particle effect: comparative toxicity of chlorpyrifos in combination with microplastics and phytoplankton particles in mussel
Summary
Researchers compared how microplastics and natural phytoplankton particles each affect the toxicity of the pesticide chlorpyrifos in mussels. They found that both particle types adsorbed the pesticide and transferred it to the mussels, but the biological effects differed depending on the carrier. The study suggests that microplastics are not uniquely dangerous as pollutant carriers, since natural particles in the environment can play a similar role in shuttling chemicals into marine organisms.
Lately, the role of microplastics (MP) as vectors for dissolved contaminants and as vehicle for their transfer to aquatic organisms has received attention. Similarly to MP, other inorganic and organic particles may act as passive samplers. However, limited comparative knowledge exists at this respect. In the present study we have comparatively investigated the risk for mussel of MP and the pesticide chlorpyrifos (CPF) alone and in combination with MP and phytoplankton particles of microalgae (MP-CPF and MA-CPF, respectively). We selected MP and microalgae of similar size to expose mussel to the same volume of particles (≈1.5 mmL ≈ equivalent to 1.5 mg MP L) and the same concentration of contaminant (CPF, 7.6 μg L). MP were virgin HDPE microparticles (≤10 μm) while the microalgae species was Isochrisis galbana (4-8 μm). Mussels were exposed for 21 days to MP, CPF, MP-CPF and MA-CPF. Then, a suite of neurotoxicity, oxidative stress and oxidative damage biomarkers were measured in samples collected at day 7 and 21. Additionally, these biochemical markers were assessed in an integrated manner with others measured at physiological, immune and cell component level in the same organisms, previously published. Overall, MP did not elicit significant alterations on the majority of parameters measured. In contrast, mussels exposed to CPF, MA-CPF and MP-CPF showed evidence of neurotoxicity and oxidant imbalance at day 7, added to a detrimental physiological condition and immune imbalance at day 21. At the latter time MP-CPF mussels showed greater alterations than CPF or MA-CPF mussels. This suggested a synergistic toxicity of MP combined with CPF greater than that produced by the contaminants alone (MP or CPF) or by MA combined with CPF.
Sign in to start a discussion.