0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Contrasting the distribution kinetics of microplastics and nanoplastics in medaka following exposure and depuration

Journal of Hazardous Materials 2024 11 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Siwen Zheng, Wen‐Xiong Wang Siwen Zheng, Wen‐Xiong Wang Siwen Zheng, Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Siwen Zheng, Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Siwen Zheng, Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang Wen‐Xiong Wang

Summary

This study tracked how micro and nanoplastics distribute across different organs in medaka fish over time after exposure and recovery. Nanoplastics spread to more organs including the brain, liver, and eyes, and were harder for the fish to clear than microplastics. The findings show that smaller plastic particles pose a greater risk because they travel further in the body and accumulate in organs, which has implications for understanding human exposure through seafood.

Direct ingestion of micro/nanoplastics (MNPs) results in significant accumulation in gastrointestinal (GI) tract of fish. The breathing process of fish makes MNPs easily retained in their gills. However, the uptake of MNPs in other fish organs remains largely unknown, let alone their kinetic processes. Herein, microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) in vivo imaging and precise quantification in various tissues (GI tract, gill, liver, brain, eye, and skin) of seawater (SW)- and freshwater (FW)- acclimated medaka Oryzias melastigma were achieved at an environmentally relevant concentration. Subsequently, the distribution kinetics of MNPs was investigated over a 96-h uptake and 48-h depuration period. MNPs were quickly and mostly captured in GI tract and gill of O. melastigma, and then transferred to liver and brain likely via blood circulation. Such transport was more efficient for NPs as compared to MPs, as evidenced by the consistently higher bioconcentration factors in both SW and FW conditions. The detection of MNPs in eye and skin of O. melastigma was more of an adsorption process, although the specific mechanisms of adsorption and absorption process can hardly be clearly differentiated. This study presented distribution kinetics of MNPs in O. melastigma and highlighted their possible transportation among tissues.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper