0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Corrigendum to “Accumulation of airborne microplastics on leaves of different tree species in the urban environment” [Sci. Total Environ. Volume 948, 20 October 2024, page 174907]

The Science of The Total Environment 2024 Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Inês Leitão, Loes van Schaik, Shinsuke Iwasaki, António Ferreira, Violette Geissen

Summary

Researchers published a correction to a figure in their study on airborne microplastic accumulation on urban tree leaves, fixing a unit error in the y-axis values (changed from p·m² to p·cm²). The correction does not change any conclusions from the original research.

The authors regret that the printed version of the above article contained an error. The Fig. 6 of the mentioned article present the relationship between microplastic (MP) particles on the leaves of different tree species versus the MP particles found under the same trees and in the open (control) from monthly deposition samples in Portugal. The units mentioned are p·cm2·month for the MPs in the monthly deposition, and p·cm2 for the MPs on leaves. However, the values presented for the monthly deposition (y axis) are in p·m2. The correct and final version of the Fig. 6 follows, with the values corrected to p·cm2 and the same scale for both parameters. This error did not change the conclusions or any information in the main text, since this figure and the respective values are mentioned in the main text as p·cm2. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.[Formula

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Corrigendum to “Atmospheric microplastic input into wetlands: Spatiotemporal patterns, drivers, and unique ecological impacts” [Water Research, 268 (2025): 122601]

This corrigendum corrects published data on atmospheric microplastic deposition into wetlands, updating spatiotemporal patterns presented in a previous paper. The correction addresses specific data errors without changing the overall conclusions of the original study.

Article Tier 2

Correction to “Microplastic Human Dietary Uptake from 1990 to 2018 Grew across 109 Major Developing and Industrialized Countries but Can Be Halved by Plastic Debris Removal”

Researchers published a correction to a large modeling study that tracked human dietary microplastic intake across 109 countries from 1990 to 2018, updating the units used for key intake parameters so that results are correctly expressed in kilograms per person per day. The underlying finding — that microplastic ingestion grew over this period but could be significantly reduced by removing plastic debris — remains unchanged.

Article Tier 2

Correction to: Characteristic of microplastics in the atmospheric fallout from Dongguan City, China: preliminary research and first evidence

This is a published correction to an earlier study on microplastics in atmospheric fallout from Dongguan City, China, fixing two errors in the original article. No new findings are presented.

Article Tier 2

Correction to “SettlingVelocities of SmallMicroplastic Fragments and Fibers”

This paper provides a published correction to a prior study on settling velocities of small microplastic fragments and fibers, addressing errors in the original data, calculations, or figures to ensure accurate reporting of particle sedimentation behavior relevant to environmental transport modeling.

Article Tier 2

Correction to: Risk-based management framework for microplastics in aquatic ecosystems

Researchers corrected mathematical errors in a previously published risk framework for microplastics in water, recalculating how particle volume and surface area were estimated. The corrected safety threshold values shifted modestly and all fell within the original confidence intervals, so the overall management conclusions remain unchanged despite the calculation fixes.

Share this paper