0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Remediation Sign in to save

Migration of Microplastics in the Rice–Duckweed System under Different Irrigation Modes

Agriculture 2024 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Cheng Hong, Cheng Hong, Zhenchang Wang, Minghao Tian, Minghao Tian, Yuexiong Wang, Jinjing Liu, Xiaoman Qiang, Umidbek Masharifov, Kexin Chen

Summary

Researchers compared microplastic migration in rice paddy systems under shallow-frequent irrigation and controlled irrigation regimes, with and without duckweed, using eight experimental treatments over a growing season. They found that shallow-frequent irrigation increased microplastic concentrations in leachate but reduced soil retention and duckweed uptake, while controlled irrigation induced soil cracking that elevated microplastic concentrations in cracked zones, and microplastic presence significantly enhanced rice root growth metrics including root volume by 46.87%.

Microplastic (MP) pollution in agriculture is garnering growing concern due to its potential detrimental impact on soil properties and crop growth, particularly affecting staple food crops such as rice. Irrigation plays a crucial role in the migration of MPs. However, limited research has focused on how different irrigation modes affect the migration of MPs in paddy fields. To simulate real-world conditions, in this experiment, two different irrigation modes were set: shallow–frequent irrigation (FWI, I0) and controlled irrigation (CI, I1). The experiment also included treatments with and without duckweed (D0 and D1, respectively), as well as treatments with and without MPs (M0 and M1). This resulted in a total of eight treatments: I0M0D0, I0M0D1, I1M0D0, I1M0D1, I0M1D0, I0M1D1, I1M1D0, and I1M1D1. Our findings indicated that compared to CI, FWI significantly increased the MP concentration in the leakage but reduced the numbers of MPs in the first soil layer and adhered by duckweed. Notably, dry–wet cycles under CI induced soil cracking, and the MP concentrations in cracked areas were significantly higher than those of crack-free soil. Moreover, compared with the MP-free treatment, MP treatments significantly influenced rice root growth, such as enhancing the average root diameter by 13.44%, root volume by 46.87%, root surface area by 30.81%, and biomass aboveground by 26.13%, respectively. The abundance of some microorganisms was also significantly influenced by the relative mobility (RM) of MPs. Furthermore, the root length was positively correlated with Planctomycetota. Meanwhile, Actinobacteriota was negatively correlated with the root surface area, root volume, and branch number, and Bacteroidota was negatively correlated with the number of root tips. However, further research is needed to elucidate how MPs influence microorganisms and, in turn, affect rice root growth.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Integrating alternate wetting and drying irrigation with duckweed for potential microplastic mitigation in rice ecosystems

Researchers investigated whether alternate wetting and drying irrigation combined with duckweed cultivation could mitigate microplastic contamination in rice ecosystems, finding that duckweed floating on paddy water captures microplastics which can then be removed through regular harvesting.

Article Tier 2

Uneven Distribution of Microplastic Pollution in Paddy Fields Driven by Irrigation Hydrodynamics

Microplastic distribution in paddy fields was found to be uneven, with accumulation patterns influenced by irrigation, tillage, and proximity to field edges. The study maps how common rice cultivation practices drive heterogeneous microplastic distribution in one of the world's most important cropping systems.

Article Tier 2

Retention and migration of microplastics in stepped paddy fields: A study on microplastic dynamics in the special irrigation system

Researchers tracked microplastic movement through stepped paddy fields in China, finding that contamination increased significantly during the rice growing season. Microplastic abundance in soil nearly doubled from pre-planting to post-harvest, with irrigation water identified as the primary input pathway. The study reveals that the terraced structure of stepped paddy fields, while designed for water management, also influences how microplastics accumulate and migrate through agricultural landscapes.

Article Tier 2

Fate of nano/microplastics and associated toxic pollutants in paddy ecosystems: Current knowledge and future perspectives

Researchers reviewed how micro- and nanoplastics enter rice paddies through irrigation, mulch films, and atmospheric deposition, then harm soil health and rice plant growth by disrupting nutrient cycles and increasing oxidative stress. Their findings are especially significant because rice feeds more than half the world's population, yet research on plastic contamination in paddy systems remains very limited.

Article Tier 2

Plastics aplenty in paddy lands: incidence of microplastics in Indian rice fields and ecotoxicity on paddy field phytoplankton

Researchers found microplastic contamination in the surface water of rice paddy fields in Kerala, India, with polyethylene and polypropylene fragments being the most common types. Microplastic levels were three times higher during the planting phase than near harvest, and the plastics affected the growth of tiny organisms that naturally live in rice paddies. These findings are concerning because rice is a dietary staple, and microplastics in rice paddies could potentially enter the food supply.

Share this paper