0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Food & Water Human Health Effects Reproductive & Development Sign in to save

Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Accumulation, Reproductive Impairment, and Associations with Nestling Body Condition in Great (Parus major)- and Blue Tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) Living near a Hotspot in Belgium

Toxics 2024 11 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Thimo Groffen, J.A.N. Buytaert, Lieven Bervoets Els Prinsen, Lieven Bervoets Marcel Eens, Marcel Eens, Els Prinsen, Lieven Bervoets Lieven Bervoets Lieven Bervoets

Summary

Researchers measured PFAS (forever chemicals) levels in eggs and blood of great tits and blue tits living near a contamination hotspot in Belgium. While PFAS accumulated in the birds, limited reproductive harm was observed, suggesting these species may be relatively tolerant. Though focused on PFAS rather than microplastics, the study is relevant because both are persistent environmental pollutants that accumulate in wildlife and can move through the food chain.

Body Systems

Due to the limited number of field studies investigating associations between environmentally relevant per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) mixtures and reproductive impairment, there is uncertainty as to whether birds are affected by PFAS pollution, whether species differ in sensitivity to PFAS, and whether the observed reproductive impairment is caused by PFAS or rather due to other potential confounding variables. Therefore, we investigated PFAS concentrations in eggs and blood plasma of great tit (<i>Parus major</i>) and blue tit (<i>Cyanistes caeruleus</i>) nestlings near a PFAS hotspot in Belgium, reproductive impairment, and associations between the accumulated levels and nestling body condition. In total, 29 eggs and 22 blood plasma samples of great tit clutches, and 10 egg and 10 blood plasma samples of blue tit clutches, were collected. Despite more types of PFAS being detected in eggs compared to plasma, only minor differences in profiles were observed between species. On the other hand, tissue-specific differences were more pronounced and likely reflect a combination of maternal transfer and dietary exposure post-hatching. Despite the high concentrations detected in both species, limited reproductive impairment was observed. Our results support previous findings that great tits and blue tits may not be very susceptible to PFAS pollution and provide evidence that other factors, including ecological stoichiometry, may be more important in explaining inter-species variation in PFAS accumulation and reproductive impairment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper